Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 3:14 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Plans are to open the new building in 2014. Very exciting news. www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123255034

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 3:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
Good news. :D But that same amount could have been made selling all the outside USAFM aircraft around the country to private individuals.:twisted:

(just joking) :)

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 1:08 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Is that to put their Space Shuttle in? :hide:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:50 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Mike wrote:
Is that to put their Space Shuttle in? :hide:

That was their original intention. The presidential aircraft will go in there along w/ all their space related objects and the remaining aircraft on outside display.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:13 am
Posts: 144
Location: St.Louis, Missouri
I wish they could get all of the experimental aircraft over to the main area also. The next building after this one maybe :D . Soon you'll need three days to take the whole museum in closely.

aeroeng


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 841
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
A 4th building is certainly an immediate need for the collection. But looking ahead it seems to me that in reality TWO buildings are really required to house all of the existing and forthcoming exhibits. For example: XC-99,C-5,C-141,KC-10, C-135 variants (e.g. E,R,K & V), E-3, E-4,C-17,C-9, T-43, YC-125, C-60, C-119, C-82, C-131, T-29, all Presidential A/C, X-1 thru X-5, XB-70, C-12, C-20, C-21,C-22, C-23, C-25, C-25, C-26,C-27,C-28, C-29, C-32, C-35,C-37, C-38, B-17D, B-17F,...to name a few. Yes, Space Shuttle too. Does the NMUSAF have a Douglas B-23 and a Lockheed RB-69 stuck away? I believe there is a Douglas C-33 (DC-2) and an O-46 in storage and didn't I see a WIX thread a note regarding the B-42 and B-43 restoration as well. The Lockheed B-37 Lexington is coming too.

Did I miss any? Nope, not a one...yeah, right. Don't forget all the exhibits hanging from the ceilings due to lack of space.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
jdvoss wrote:
A 4th building is certainly an immediate need for the collection. But looking ahead it seems to me that in reality TWO buildings are really required to house all of the existing and forthcoming exhibits. For example: XC-99,C-5,C-141,KC-10, C-135 variants (e.g. E,R,K & V), E-3, E-4,C-17,C-9, T-43, YC-125, C-60, C-119, C-82, C-131, T-29, all Presidential A/C, X-1 thru X-5, XB-70, C-12, C-20, C-21,C-22, C-23, C-25, C-25, C-26,C-27,C-28, C-29, C-32, C-35,C-37, C-38, B-17D, B-17F,...to name a few. Yes, Space Shuttle too. Does the NMUSAF have a Douglas B-23 and a Lockheed RB-69 stuck away? I believe there is a Douglas C-33 (DC-2) and an O-46 in storage and didn't I see a WIX thread a note regarding the B-42 and B-43 restoration as well. The Lockheed B-37 Lexington is coming too.

Did I miss any? Nope, not a one...yeah, right. Don't forget all the exhibits hanging from the ceilings due to lack of space.



They do have a B-23.

Image
Cheers,
Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 11:18 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5747
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
jdvoss wrote:
A 4th building is certainly an immediate need for the collection. But looking ahead it seems to me that in reality TWO buildings are really required to house all of the existing and forthcoming exhibits. For example: XC-99,C-5,C-141,KC-10, C-135 variants (e.g. E,R,K & V), E-3, E-4,C-17,C-9, T-43, YC-125, C-60, C-119, C-82, C-131, T-29, all Presidential A/C, X-1 thru X-5, XB-70, C-12, C-20, C-21,C-22, C-23, C-25, C-25, C-26,C-27,C-28, C-29, C-32, C-35,C-37, C-38, B-17D, B-17F,...to name a few. Yes, Space Shuttle too. Does the NMUSAF have a Douglas B-23 and a Lockheed RB-69 stuck away? I believe there is a Douglas C-33 (DC-2) and an O-46 in storage and didn't I see a WIX thread a note regarding the B-42 and B-43 restoration as well. The Lockheed B-37 Lexington is coming too.

Did I miss any? Nope, not a one...yeah, right. Don't forget all the exhibits hanging from the ceilings due to lack of space.

Sounds like you have it pretty well covered. It does seem that 2 buildings will be needed to house all of these. There are some very large aircraft in that list. It will be interesting to see how they eventually all fit in.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 1:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Mike wrote:
Is that to put their Space Shuttle in? :hide:



Yup after the other museum fails to take care of theirs.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:03 am
Posts: 173
mustangdriver wrote:
Yup after the other museum fails to take care of theirs.


You mean like the NMUSAF is doing with the planes at Barksdale AFB and Chanute AFB? The NMUSAF has let them get away with neglecting those planes for decades in some cases and never done a thing about it except write them letters and make threats.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
The B-34/B-37 is already there. I saw the fuselage on the ramp outside the restoration hangars in March.

One that I didn't see on your list is the Spanish He-111. It's been in storage for decades..back in the '90s I heard that the museum had recovered a set of Jumos from a wreck ditched in Norway, and planned to restore the aircraft to represent a Heinkel.

Oh, and the early Douglas transport they have is a C-39..from what I understand it's basically a DC-2 fuselage with a DC-3 center section and tail feathers (there are a bewildering number of designations for various civilian DC-2/3s that were impressed into military service. Most were built to order with different features for different airlines, each variant got its own designation.)

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
warbird2 wrote:
mustangdriver wrote:
Yup after the other museum fails to take care of theirs.


You mean like the NMUSAF is doing with the planes at Barksdale AFB and Chanute AFB? The NMUSAF has let them get away with neglecting those planes for decades in some cases and never done a thing about it except write them letters and make threats.



Both of those museums are trying to do their best with what they have. They also need volunteers very bad. So I'm sure if you tried to volunteer there they'd be thrilled to have you

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:03 am
Posts: 173
mustangdriver wrote:
warbird2 wrote:
mustangdriver wrote:
Both of those museums are trying to do their best with what they have. They also need volunteers very bad. So I'm sure if you tried to volunteer there they'd be thrilled to have you


I stopped by the BAFB museum last October. It didn't look to me like they were trying very hard to do anything. They do not even appear to pressure wash their planes. As for volunteering, as soon as I get done with my upgrade training I intend to volunteer at the AMC museum at Dover AFB. But thanks for trying to make it look like I am not practicing what I preach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 7:07 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
There are a few folks on here who have worked with the Barksdale group and there are current volunteers on here from Chanute. They can tell you about the challenges they face on a day to day basis. Just to be clear there was a thread about the CHanute Air Museum and the NMUSAF requesting some planes back from them, and the NMUSAF was getting bashed in it. Now you are ticked that the planes continue to stay there. It's a lose lose for them the way I see it.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 7:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:03 am
Posts: 173
mustangdriver wrote:
There are a few folks on here who have worked with the Barksdale group and there are current volunteers on here from Chanute. They can tell you about the challenges they face on a day to day basis. Just to be clear there was a thread about the CHanute Air Museum and the NMUSAF requesting some planes back from them, and the NMUSAF was getting bashed in it. Now you are ticked that the planes continue to stay there. It's a lose lose for them the way I see it.


I am not bashing the NMUSAF at all None of that changes the fact that two museums made 99% out of NMUSAF assets are not taking care of the airplanes in the manner that is required by the loan agreements and they have not done anything about it at WPAFB other than write a few letters and make a few threats. Most AFB museums are behind the fence at some military base, out of the reach of people without ID cards. These are two museums open to the general public. Many peoples view of the NMUSAF will be based only on what they see at those two museums. I do not see why they are putting up with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 270 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group