Just saw this thread.
After getting my licence in Cessnas, I bought a well used Aeronca L-16 and flew it almost every day on car gas (1986). That is where I really learned to fly. I read where a Spitfire pilot said he used a Champ to keep his skills up so that was good for me. A wonderful airplane the Aeronca, which is all about the joy of flying without the cost.
Next had an opportunity (1987) to buy a well-worn SNJ. I had read everything I could find on the T-6, and had some anxiety aftr all the horror stories. It was easier than the Champ to land. A little squirlley on the ground and a sharp stall break, but I was so reflexive in using the rudder it was not a difficult transition. Another terrific airplane which really teaches one a lot about flying, and this time in a heavier complex airplane. I owned Bu85028 for 9 wonderful years and learned a lot about working on airplanes.
After a 10 year hiatus while stationed overseas, a T-28A followed. The EASIEST and sweetest aircraft to fly, ever. Comfortable, fast and totally uncaring of cross-winds where it would be a no-go for the Champ or SNJ. But, much like the T-6, that wonderfulness had a higher operating cost for newly retired me that took some of the fun out of it.
Wanting to get back to the wonderful (and more inexpensive) purity of flight but still have the historical warbird aspect, I have settled on what is right for me: full size WW1 replicas. While much much less expensive to own an operate, they are more challenging to fly and really demand your attention and piloting skills improve, which to me makes them all the more rewarding to fly. Since I was a kid, there were three ultimate planes: a Spitfire, Corsair and a Sopwith Camel. For the price of a nice SUV, I now have one of my dream airplanes, and it burns 7 gallons an hour. There is a magic to these Great War planes, and the historical tie-in is great. I am really not trying to impress anyone, and this little plane hits all the right experiances for me. I can never afford a Corsair or a Spit, but the Camel replica, with the same performance as the original, also has the advantage of being experimental and flyable within LSA criteria (those to whom that is important will get the implications).
So there it is, in a way, full circle.
