Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 26, 2026 9:18 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 287 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
lmritger wrote:
Seems like we're starting to stray into the "how long is a piece of string?" area,
but FWIW, perhaps "Liberty Belle destroyed after forced landing, everyone OK" might satisfy the requirements of those objecting to the word "crash"?

Lynn

ah...it really wasn't a 'BIG' deal...
It is just odd that you read the newspaper or postings and you see "CRASH" "CRASH" "CRASH"... and it really wasn't a crash.

It just paints negativity on the warbird community, that’s all.
Just an opinion...

I see the change on the title and I think it is better.

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 98
Lynn Allen wrote:
I wonder if they feathered the engine to shut the fuel off? Its a sad and empty feeling to see it burn up and to see the burnt hull afterwards...



Lynn,

On a multi-engine aircraft, it's commonly the second step to feather the prop when shutting it down. a windmilling prop creates A LOT of drag, and can cause an aircraft to not climb. I imagine it was feathered in an effort to shut the engine down to fight the in-flight fire.

To be honest, the perception of if it crashed or made an emergency landing (which is my vote) doesn't matter to us aviation folks as it does to the average Joe or Senator that looks as this type of event as a reason to not like flying, aviation, or anything to do with those things. That perception is more critical. Unfortunately, someone in congress is going to spin this off to be that all WWII aircraft should be grounded. Mark my words.

A better way to look at it is "Wow, the Fortress saves her crew yet again, 70 years later!" They don't build them like they used to.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:29 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Thanks for the title change, and don't get me wrong- I agree that we want to be careful how this is phrased, for the exact reasons "mh53eflyguy" says... public perception is EVERYTHING when it comes to operating vintage aircraft. There's always some delicate ninny waiting to clutch their pearls and scream "Oh, won't someone think of the children!" when something bad happens, and as enthusiasts, volunteers or operators, we all have a responsibility to help correct any misconceptions about the aircraft and the community at large.

And so far, I'd say this has been pretty much a textbook example of how we can all come together in a time of sadness, rally around Don Brooks, and do what we can to celebrate the brief but spectacular life of the Liberty Belle.

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:10 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Very sad indeed. Given the circumstances I think the crew did an exceptional job getting the Fortress down and egressing the aircraft. I once watched a MH-53 IFE on to a green on a VA Beach golf course due to a delaminating rotor blade. Any landing you can walk away from....

The last time I saw her, Tattoo 2010:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Last edited by Shay on Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
TriangleP wrote:
This thread has been respectful, which I appreciate a lot from all the those posting here. We all care about what happened. Its heart breaking to see this happen.
I can't add much to the discussion and the on-going investigation will surely point to the cause of the fire. But no matter the cause of the problem, the pilots and crew showed exceptional poise and professionalism getting her down immediately to the first available and safe location, and executing it safely and successfully. Once the fire started in the location it was at, I believe that the outcome for the airframe was inevitable. Had it burned thru the wing, she would have folded in mid-flight. So because of this I believe the crew are truely heroes as they saved the lives of their passengers and so they are (in my book) in the same category as Capt. Sullenberger and his crew that force landed in the Hudson River. The actions of the crew of Liberty Belle can't be underestimated, in my view. In the long run, after the loss has been fully absorbed by us all, this will stand out as the most important memory, as the mighty B-17 brought everyone home again. For her last mission, she saved lives by her tough design. No higher testament exists for the crews actions than the smiles and relief on the passengers faces.


Well said TriangleP!
Best Regards,
Paul

Image

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 98
Shay wrote:
I once watched a MH-53 IFE on to a green on a VA Beach golf course due to a delaminating rotor blade. Any landing you can walk away from....


Not to take away from the topic with a sidebar, I know exactly the incident you are talking about. I was with HM-14 when that happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:29 am 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
It is heart braking news... but I'm so glad that everyone was OK in the aircraft. My greatest respect to the crew for making what seems the right choice to get the aircraft on the ground asap with minimal risk to life.


Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 6:15 pm
Posts: 120
Location: Western Wa.
So sad to see this happen .......................


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:07 pm
Posts: 563
Location: Clear Lake City, Texas
From a tour @ Hooks Airport in Tomball (Texas) Airport on 2-10-10

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:48 pm
Posts: 230
Location: minnesota lakes
mh53eflyguy wrote:
Shay wrote:
I once watched a MH-53 IFE on to a green on a VA Beach golf course due to a delaminating rotor blade. Any landing you can walk away from....


Not to take away from the topic with a sidebar, I know exactly the incident you are talking about. I was with HM-14 when that happened.




Not to take away from the real topic but
We lost 4 blade pockets in a HC-3 ch-46 and water taxied up to the Hotel Del in coronado in 1976. We got stuck in the sand at the beach

_________________
PAPPY ch-46 phrog,endangerd species 40 years and still flying


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5236
Location: Stratford, CT.
June so far hasn't been a good month for bombers. First the B-25 in France and now this. Aerovintage isn't going to like this. I cant say anything more than what has already been echoed here. Delighted to hear no injuries or fatalities. Absolutely gutted and distraught to see the images and videos of this piece of American and Connecticut history lost. While it seems that we've lost something irreplaceable I have hope that our industrial building techniques have come far enough to do a data plate restoration with what parts are still salvageable from this wreck. This may be lofty and unrealistic but with some of the B-17 restorations taking place it seems doable if the drive and funds are there. This seems like the physical end to this 17, but the spirit could live on in a new new-build airframe. Heres to hoping...

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:07 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2940
This comment was just posted on the Liberty Foundation's Facebook page...
Quote:
First, let me start off by sincerely thanking everyone for the outpouring of support that we are receiving. I am sorry that I have not yet had the opportunity to return the many phone calls, text or e-mails that I am receiving offering to help. Again, thank you for all of the kind words that we are receiving and for incredible offers to help emotionally, financially and/or with the recovery process. I hope this statement will help fill in a few details that everyone is wondering about that led to the loss of our “Liberty Belle”.



Yesterday morning, both our P-40 and B-17 were scheduled to fly from Aurora, Illinois to Indianapolis, Indiana. We were in Aurora for the weekend as a part of our scheduled tour. Over the course of the previous week, we completed a scheduled 25-hour inspection on the B-17 which was completed by Saturday. On Saturday, the weather stayed below the required ceiling to give any passenger flights, however the B-17 flew in the morning on a routine training proficiency flight, performing several patterns. Following the flight, other maintenance issues arose that required us to cancel our Sunday flying schedule for repairs. The maintenance performed has not been, in any way, associated to the chain of events that led to Monday’s fateful flight, but is being considered in the preliminary investigation. However, due to the media’s sensational (mis)reporting, there is a large amount of misinformation that continues to lead the news.



Here is what we do know… Flying in the left seat of the B-17 was Capt. John Hess. John has been flying our Liberty Belle since 2005 and one of our most experienced B-17 pilots. He is an active Delta Air Lines Captain with over 14,000 hours of flying experience and flys a variety of vintage WWII aircraft. In the right seat was Bud Sittic. While Bud is new to the Liberty Foundation this year, he is also incredibly experienced with over 14,000 hours of flying time in vintage and hi-performance aircraft. He is a retired Captain with Delta Air Lines.



The news misidentified the P-40 as flying chase during the accident. I was flying our P-40, however I had departed 20 minutes prior to the B-17’s takeoff on the short flight to Indianapolis to setup for the B-17’s arrival. The aircraft flying chase was a T-6 Texan flown by owner Cullen Underwood. Cullen is one of our rated B-17 Captains and an experienced aviator tagging along as a support ship.



The takeoff of both aircraft was uneventful and proceeded on-course southeast. Prior to exiting Aurora’s airport traffic area, the B-17 crew and passengers began investigating an acrid smell and started a turn back to the airport. Almost immediately thereafter, Cullen spotted flames coming from the left wing and reported over the radio that they were on fire.



As all pilots know, there are few emergency situations that are more critical than having an in-flight fire. While it is extremely rare, it can (and sometimes does) indiscriminately affect aircraft of any age or type. In-flight fires have led to the loss of not only aircraft, but often can result in catastrophic loss of life. It requires an immediate action on the flight crew, as the integrity of aircraft structure, systems and critical components are in question.



Directly below the B-17 was a farmer’s field and the decision was made to land immediately. Approximately 1 minute and 40 seconds from the radio report of the fire, the B-17 was down safely on the field. Within that 1:40 time frame, the crew shutdown and feathered the number 2 engine, activated the engine’s fire suppression system, lowered the landing gear and performed an on-speed landing. Bringing the B-17 to a quick stop, the crew and passengers quickly and safely exited the aircraft. Overhead in the T-6, Cullen professionally coordinated and directed the firefighting equipment which was dispatched by Aurora Tower to the landing location.



Unlike the sensational photos that you have all seen of the completely burned B-17 on the news, you will see from photos taken by our crew that our Liberty Belle was undamaged by the forced landing and at the time of landing, the wing fire damage was relatively small. The crew actually unloaded bags, then had the horrible task of watching the aircraft slowly burn while waiting for the fire trucks to arrive. There were high hopes that the fire would be extinguished quickly and the damage would be repairable. Those hopes were diminished as the fire trucks deemed the field too soft to cross due to the area’s recent rainfall. So while standing by our burning B-17 and watching the fire trucks parked at the field’s edge, they sadly watched the wing fire spread to the aircraft’s fuel cells and of course, you all have seen the end result. There is no doubt that had the fire equipment been able to reach our aircraft, the fire would have been quickly extinguished and our Liberty Belle would have been repaired to continue her worthwhile mission.



Let me go on the record by thanking the flight crew for their professionalism. Their actions were nothing short of heroic and their quick thinking, actions and experience led to a “successful” outcome to this serious in-flight emergency. John and Bud (and Cullen) did a remarkable job under extreme circumstances and performed spectacularly. While the leading news stories have repeatedly reported the “crash” of our B-17, fact is they made a successful forced landing and the aircraft was ultimately consumed by fire. Airplanes are replaceable but people are not and while the aircraft’s loss is tragic, it was a successful result.



This leads me into discussing the exceptional safety record of the Boeing B-17 and to hopefully squash the naysayers who preach we should not be flying these types of aircraft. Since we first flew the “Liberty Belle” in December of 2004, we have flown over 20,000 passengers throughout the country and if you count our historic trip to Europe in 2008, worldwide. Of the other touring B-17s, some of which that have been touring for over 20 years, they have safely flown hundreds of thousands of people. The aircraft’s safety record is spectacular and I am certain the overall cause of our issue, which is under investigation, will not tarnish that safety record. In fact, as many of you know, other B-17 have suffered significant damage (although not as bad as ours!), only to be re-built to fly again. From a passenger carrying standpoint, I can think of few aircraft that offer the same level of safety as the 4-engine “Flying Fortress”. As mentioned earlier, in-flight fires are extremely rare and certainly could affect any powered aircraft under certain circumstances. I would put my children today in any of the other touring B-17s to go fly. I suggest to anyone that was thinking of doing so when a B-17 visits your area to do so without giving our loss any thought.



There is wild speculation going on as to the cause of our fire and the affect to other operators. Please let the investigation run its course and report the findings. The NTSB and FAA were quickly on the scene and we are working closely with them to aid in the investigation. As soon as we receive some additional information, we will release it via the website http://www.libertyfoundation.org/.



The ultimate question remains, where does the Liberty Foundation go from here? After the investigation and recovery, we will determine our options. We are still committed to the restoration and flying of World War II aircraft. Again, we appreciate the support and people offering to help get us back flying.



Please check back for updates. I will close by thanking everyone that made our tour so successful. From the first day of the B-17’s restoration, thank you for all of you who labored to get her flying over the initial restoration years and to everyone that has worked on her out on tour since. Thank you to the crewmembers, tour coordinators and volunteers who gave up weekends and countless hours to support her on the road. And finally, thank you to the passengers, donors and media patrons that flew aboard and everyone who supported our cause. Hopefully, this will not be the end of the story, but a new beginning.



Regards,

Ray Fowler

The Liberty Foundation, Chief Pilot


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 13
So very happy all aboard are safe. Have to admit to musing about how often the same scene was repeated in East Anglia decades ago... no doubt the circumstances of those landings were not always as benign to the crews involved as was this landing.

Hearty "well done" to the crew. Liberty Belle will be missed but not forgotten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
Having experienced an in-flight cargo fire indication (which thankfully turned out to be false) I'll echo Ray Fowlers coment, "As all pilots know, there are few emergency situations that are more critical than having an in-flight fire."

One minute, forty seconds from indication to brakes parked. OUTSTANDING! Truly sad that the circumstances could not have saved the ship but, the fact that all seven souls walked away is testament to the airmanship of the pilots.

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Great to see Ray's message.

One interesting note - yesterday was a bad day for Boeing products - http://www.faa.gov/data_research/accide ... 0614_N.txt

One can only chuckle at the other two incidences although the second could have been quite spectacular (and thankfully it wasn't), but at least it we had no fatal accidents or incidents yesterday.

Also, neither the NTSB nor the FAA will ever classify an event as a "crash" except in passing in the narration and even then they do their best to avoid the word "crash". It's either an Accident or an Incident, and then varying types of them (Forced Landing, Impact with Terrain, etc). Per the FAA report, it was an Accident due to a forced landing and post-landing fire.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 287 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradburger, Google Adsense [Bot], WIXerGreg and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group