Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:51 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Central Illinois
OUCH :o

"An unusual accident at the Alameda Naval Station Tuesday seriously damaged a newly restored jet that has been on display for over 40 years when the crane lifting the aircraft toppled over.
The A-4 Skyhawk jet greeted visitors to the Alameda Naval Station from 1969 until it was removed from its display stand for the recent restoration work.
The 42-ton crane was lifting the 5,500-pound aircraft back onto its pylon Tuesday afternoon when suddenly the crane tilted and crashed, dropping the plane to the ground."

http://www.ktvu.com/news/28241048/detail.html

_________________
"Thirty seconds....We went like this, he went like that. I said to Hollywood, "Where'd he go?" Hollywood says, "Where'd who gooooooo?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
Any landing you walk away from...
:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
No jokes about the winner of the spot landing contest?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 9:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
An A-4 Skyhawk may have just been mortally wounded. Who can make jokes at a time like this,....sniff....

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
I like the headline there:

Accident at NAVY base damages AIR FORCE jet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:05 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
You got to love the media, if they screw up as bad with the stuff we don't really know about, who knows what's really goin' on in the world !

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
RickH wrote:
You got to love the media, if they screw up as bad with the stuff we don't really know about, who knows what's really goin' on in the world !

I could ramble on and on about a certain current C-in C, but I will leave it alone. Suffice it to say, Your statement speaks VOLUMES.

Scott

_________________
1942 Dodge WC-51 Weapons Carrier
I am a reenactor, have been since the early 1980s, and I am an aviation enthusiast, PILOT, A&P mechanic, and military vehicle owner. I have restored cars, trucks, and antique radios. These are MY hobbies- What are YOURS?.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Did you know that the U.S. Army had two A4's? 2 A4D-2N's (buairno 148483 & 148490) were modified with dual wheeled mains , requiring new, squarer main wheel doors and a drag chute. Both were evaluated in 1957 @ Ft. Rucker. They were flown off against the FIAT G-91 'Gina' and the NORTHROP N-156.
The Air Force stepped in and took the fixed wing ground attack mission away from the Army, so the 'Scooters' were reconfigured back to standard and returned to the Navy. They both kept all their Navy markings during the tests but the subjects would be a real 'SAY WHAT??' project for a modeller.

The Army also earlier on had at least 3 T-37's for evaluation, 63464, 63465, and 63466 were also tested @ Ft. Rucker carrying ARMY markings on both sides of the nose.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Central Illinois
The city of Alameda put in $50,000 and the restoration crew put in two years worth of work just to have it dropped like that...heart breaking. Somebody on that crane crew probably lost their job on that one. Now they are saying it looks like another two years of work...wow.

_________________
"Thirty seconds....We went like this, he went like that. I said to Hollywood, "Where'd he go?" Hollywood says, "Where'd who gooooooo?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Robbie Roberts wrote:
I could ramble on and on about a certain current C-in C

I'd really rather you didn't. What the heck have your political views got to do with the A-4 being damaged? We've had enough political nonsense spouted on this site lately without yet more irrelevant claptrap being disseminated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 847
Location: DAL glidepath
^^^Agreed. Plenty of other places on the web for that. Now back to the plane...

...how early of an A-4 is this and how many of this model are left? Sure looked pretty...except where it was gouged out by the crane. Yikes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:35 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
Mike wrote:
Robbie Roberts wrote:
I could ramble on and on about a certain current C-in C

I'd really rather you didn't. What the heck have your political views got to do with the A-4 being damaged? We've had enough political nonsense spouted on this site lately without yet more irrelevant claptrap being disseminated.


If you are going to quote me, please use the FULL quote- I said I would leave it alone, and I did. Bad quoting by the media is one of the reasons we have these messes. Didn't need a request to do what I'd already done. Since you brought it up, it is because they misreported the aircraft that the statement about the media I was responding to got made, and I merely said I agreed, that the media, through misreporting, intentional misrepresentation and out & out ignoring certain facts, has led to bad situations. I spouted no "irrelevant claptrap". To reiterate my second, and final, statement,"[Rick H's] statement speaks VOLUMES."

Scott

_________________
1942 Dodge WC-51 Weapons Carrier
I am a reenactor, have been since the early 1980s, and I am an aviation enthusiast, PILOT, A&P mechanic, and military vehicle owner. I have restored cars, trucks, and antique radios. These are MY hobbies- What are YOURS?.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:23 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Most of that airframe's new injuries could be rectified in a matter of hours by installing a new tail section.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 847
Location: DAL glidepath
Rick,

How did they differ between the early/late models?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 322
Smaller intakes for the smaller engine, or at least lesser rated, no hump for avionics. Cute airplane, sleek. Hope they get it fixed soon.
Chris...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 283 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group