RyanShort1 wrote:
I wonder if that 22 could be a typo. There was that earlier report of 11 Gs, and it wouldn't be too hard to be one key off... of course, if that data is correct, it would certainly explain a LOT.
It really depends on what type of instrument is measuring G, where it's located, and how it measures. It could be possible that BOTH numbers are legitimate.
One airplane I've flown has a system with mutiple sensors all over the aircraft that measures the G both in terms of an absolute number, but also in terms of the % of acceleration allowed on that particular portion of the airplane -- you'd be surprised how different the G readings can be at different points on the aircraft, even under what appears to be a totally symmetric application of G. Under this situation, it would be possible to have one spot on the airplane record 11G and a different sensor record 22G.
Another airplane I've flown samples G at something like 20Hz, but doesn't display the individual samples to the pilot. Instead, it averages the G over a rolling set of three samples, and then displays that average. In this scenario, it would be possible that there was a "spike" of 22G in one of those 20Hz samples, yet the "average" G displayed and recorded would be 11G.
So, until we know the source of the G readings, and have some idea about what recorded them, it's impossible to know if they're spurious or not.
_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.