Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:07 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Wichita, KS
I know of at least 3 F-84F projects looking for canopy plexi at the moment. We should all pool together and have a vacuum mold made and split the vacuum forming cost for custom plexi. My canopy is ok, but it's crazed and looks sorta ugly. I know someone in Georgia that also needs canopy plexi and the KAM F-84F has replacemtn plexi on it but isn't properly the bubble shape it should be. We could have a mold worked up based on my canopy if need be.

_________________
F-84F Simulator Project
www.f-84f.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:40 am
Posts: 987
Interesting discussion about a none mainstream jet. I've often wondered if we'll ever see an increase in airworthy Cold War-era USAF jets in the warbird community- F-84G, F-84F, F-80, etc.


Chappie

_________________
Brrring. Dispersal? TWO SECTIONS SCRAMBLE!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:07 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Wichita, KS
I seriously doubt we'll ever see another F-84F flying anytime soon. Not sure why you consider an F-84F a non-mainstream jet. They produced a bunch of them. They're just not as sexy as the F-86 to the general public. IMHO, Republic over-engineered and under-powered them. I think the cockpit design was ahead of it's time though. The throttle quadrant is especially advanced and ergonomic for a 50's era fighter-bomber.

_________________
F-84F Simulator Project
www.f-84f.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:21 am
Posts: 30
Location: Galena, Ohio
Clifford, I don't know if they are inboard or outboard they're in deep storage now but the part # on the shackles are 37W79314-11 pylon length is 7 1/2 feet. Paper tag has them for the F-84. Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:07 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Wichita, KS
spencerat6 wrote:
Clifford, I don't know if they are inboard or outboard they're in deep storage now but the part # on the shackles are 37W79314-11 pylon length is 7 1/2 feet. Paper tag has them for the F-84. Bob


Just checked the F-84F IPC p316-317 (figure 161-, index # -7). 37W79314-11 refers to a piece on an outboard pylon assembly (37W70930). They call it "BRACE, sway" as the part description. Has to be outboard pylons.

Diagram: http://www.upl.co/uploads/IPCp316sm.gif
Parts List: http://www.upl.co/uploads/IPCp317sm.gif

_________________
F-84F Simulator Project
www.f-84f.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:40 am
Posts: 987
BHawthorne wrote:
I seriously doubt we'll ever see another F-84F flying anytime soon. Not sure why you consider an F-84F a non-mainstream jet. They produced a bunch of them. They're just not as sexy as the F-86 to the general public.


That's pretty much what I meant. It's not a Century series fighter, its did not shoot down 792 MiGs over the Yalu, and it did not get down in the mud of Korea with the F-80s and F-84Gs. When I think of the F-model I think Thunderbirds and maybe SAC escort squadrons.

Chappie

_________________
Brrring. Dispersal? TWO SECTIONS SCRAMBLE!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: F-84F parts?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:07 pm
Posts: 354
Location: Wichita, KS
Chappie wrote:
BHawthorne wrote:
I seriously doubt we'll ever see another F-84F flying anytime soon. Not sure why you consider an F-84F a non-mainstream jet. They produced a bunch of them. They're just not as sexy as the F-86 to the general public.


That's pretty much what I meant. It's not a Century series fighter, its did not shoot down 792 MiGs over the Yalu, and it did not get down in the mud of Korea with the F-80s and F-84Gs. When I think of the F-model I think Thunderbirds and maybe SAC escort squadrons.

Chappie


Yep, mine (51-9345) was low key assignments. The history card only shows it at Luke 3600th CCTW and Sheppard 3750th TTNW. Not sure what 3750th TTNW was, but from what I understand of the aircraft it wasn't a flyer at Sheppard.

Image

_________________
F-84F Simulator Project
www.f-84f.org


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group