This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:16 pm
Richard, the tail number format was changed. They applied it correctly. The jet was 64, the tail numbers at the time dropped the first number.
Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:21 pm
Hey Richard...thanks for the kudos about our team effort...any ideas for phase 2 are welcome....
That's a pretty common question about the tail #'s....look in WIX for other links with details. I burned a lot of airtime with Maxwell AFB USAF History dept on that topic....over the years the coding has changed a few times.
The budget year (not the manufacturing year) for 683 was 1964. So that year they would go with the last digit of the budget year with the 4 digits of the a/c...so 1964-0683 becomes 40 - 683....
Guess they didn't think about F-4s being produced for so long...! !
Thanks again for the inquriry...any other details welcome...
Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:44 pm
Thanks Rick for showing if you repeat something enough times in the Houston heat...I do remember it!
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.