This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 7:17 am

Chappie wrote:Well TF-51 is better than a cut up Unlimited.

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:23 am

I think he means scrapped.

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 4:41 pm

So it went from a "cut up unlimited" to being cut up even further in its conversion to a TF-51, right? Afterwards it had even fewer original parts than it did before.

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:54 pm

bdk wrote:So it went from a "cut up unlimited" to being cut up even further in its conversion to a TF-51, right? Afterwards it had even fewer original parts than it did before.


But the new, non-original, non-cut up parts look more like the original, non-cut up parts than the cut up original parts did so it's better now than it was when it had the cut up original parts. That's clear, right?

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:27 pm

I think you could make a case that being Sumthin’ Else made it a historic aircraft in it's own right.
But as long as it gets to punch holes in clouds it's doing the right thing, and as a TF-51 it gives an opportunity for (some of) the masses say they flew A Reno racer.

Re: Why are there no Reno reports on the Information Exchang

Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:46 pm

John Crocker was a good friend and I would think he'd be glad his Mustang is still flying. We worked together for many years.
Post a reply