Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:29 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-29
Currently airworthy aircraft
Also, the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is considering restoring Bockscar to airworthy condition; it is presently exhibited as a static display. The Smithsonian has the complete Enola Gay at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center as a static display, but does not plan to bring the airplane back to flight status as that would likely compromise the preservation of the plane as an historic item.
Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:54 am
Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:16 am
Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:28 pm
originalboxcar wrote:We should keep in mind that "anybody" can writeup a wiki and put whatever info. we feel like adding (true or not).
What type of shape is bockcar in? Is she a timecapsule? Did she remain largely intact during here AMARC internment from '46 - '61? I know the Enola Gay was deteriorating while store at Andrew AFB and I'm not sure how original she is.
Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:21 pm
Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:03 pm
MHO, if you want to help B29's fly, support CAF's "FiFi" or support the restoration efforts for "Doc". If you have heard those four engines overhead and seen a B29 fly, well, it IS pretty unique and worthy of our support.
Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:06 pm
Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:07 pm
Col. Rohr wrote:Ok Folks,
Lets take a look at this there are three reason why this will never happen,
1. USAF doesn't have the money to restored and fly it.
2. Boxcar along with EnolaGay are two of the four aircraft on the National Preservation list.
3. Who would fly it Civilians Pilot or Active USAF if Active then they would have to fall under Training Command besides there are only 10 B-29 Qualf. Pilots out there.
Cheers
RER
Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:32 pm
Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:17 am
kennsmithf2g wrote:Does the Dayton Air Force Museum still have the B-29 section that you can walk through?
Kenn
Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:41 am
Col. Rohr wrote:Ok Can someone explain how one goes and makes a respound to the article because i sure the He!! would like to set him straight.
RER
Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:49 pm
Kansan wrote:Col. Rohr wrote:Ok Can someone explain how one goes and makes a respound to the article because i sure the He!! would like to set him straight.
RER
I just had a look - it's already been done. The article just mentions "doc" now. Did anyone here edit it? Good job, anyway.
Rob / Kansan
Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:38 pm
Tue Nov 15, 2005 7:35 pm
Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:56 pm