Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:58 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 17
paper on the fuselage? looks like they are getting ready to re stencil the fuselage numbers to me. since the numbers in the black and white parts shot do not match up to the shot with 2 guys in it assuming both sides are identical.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
They seem to be taped over USAF lettering--TA-69Y?.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:09 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
The float as seen in the B&W photos doesn't look like Kingfisher to me (tto pointed in the front)...wonder if it was Japanese..or locally made?
I'd bet there was still wartime wrecks lying around then...and I'm not sure where they would have found a Kingfisher float at that late date.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 11:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
I remember reading about this a few years ago; the center float was Japanese in origin, and in the color close up you can see what look like doublers for spreader bars so I'm guessing "Jake" maybe, and the tip floats were ex P-80 tip tanks. Apparently it flew pretty well.

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:44 pm
Posts: 305
Well you certainly can learn something new everyday.

Personally, I think it looks better with floats than it does with wheels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:04 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4331
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Someone on another forum said the center float came from a Japanese "Rufe." If that's the case, then the big center pylon has been removed and the attachment point skinned over.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 3:30 pm
Posts: 97
The wingtip floats also have a different shape to the back of them in the color photo. Could it be a different plane or the same prototype modified?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
This shows how bad my memory is getting. The magazine in question was Aero Digest May 1953, not Popular something else!

The aircraft in question was T-6F (identical to an SNJ-6, which I called it earlier) 44-81691 (6147th TCG, 6148th TCS) which crashed into the sea E of the 38th parallel Dec 17, 1950, with both crewmen rescued.

The article makes it clear that the float was home grown, not rescued from another aircraft type, and was initially installed 2" too far forward. This was corrected after some tests.

Designated KN-1 by the Korean Navy, the aircraft was used in an anti-smuggling campaign for several months before a fatal crash near Chinhae naval base in late November 1951.

cheers
Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:17 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
I doubt very much that that float was scratch built as there's as much work in building a float as there is in building a fuselage, especially if you have to make the bottom skins. If you look at the float on the T-6 and compare it to an A6M2-N float, the profile around the nose looks pretty similar to me, and a Rufe float would have about the right amount of buoyancy. They might have built it from scratch, but it would have been a pretty major project.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
Well, I'd be willing to bet it was, and they did. Here is part of a relevant page from the article.

Image

Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Well, there you go. Never say never, I guess. That took some serious dedication. Can you scan the rest of the article?

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
I'm pretty sure I've seen one of these pics somewhere before, maybe in the Squadron/Signal "In Action" booklet on the T-6. OK, so now that it can be done, who's up to taking a Tora Zero and making a Rufe now? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 42
Location: GTA, Canada
famvburg wrote:
I'm pretty sure I've seen one of these pics somewhere before, maybe in the Squadron/Signal "In Action" booklet on the T-6.

This is the above mentioned photo from "T-6 Texan in action":
Image

_________________
Yves Marino


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
This is typical of the 'In Action' close but no cigar style of history. Many of them have great photos, but generally bad drawings and questionable text. The volume on the T-6, for one, has brutally incorrect sideview drawings.

Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 42
Location: GTA, Canada
ColeCash wrote:
paper on the fuselage? looks like they are getting ready to re stencil the fuselage numbers to me.

Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
They seem to be taped over USAF lettering--TA-69Y?.

I took a better look at the 2 photos with the letter codes. I think the old lettering is TA-691. And since the 3 numbers are the last 3 numbers of the callsign/serial number (as with the a/c below), the s/n of the T-6F is 44-81691 (6147th TCG, 6148th TCS), which crashed on Dec 17-th, 1950.
Image
Image
The color photo obviously shows different letters. They seem to be K?N.-1. The plane was designated KN-1, but there is a vertical bar (like in F or P) between the first letter (K?, but also possible A, R, X) and the last N.
Image
Could it be KFN.-1?

_________________
Yves Marino


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: quemerford, Rod Schneider, Warbird Kid and 288 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group