Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:58 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 17
...okay okay, even though the European E-3 AWACS aircraft are "merely" about 30 years old,
and the KC-135R isn't near retirement yet, :rolleyes: I just did not want to withhold you this clip...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4O8kaKMv_U

After 25 seconds things get interesting, and from 0.38 onwards downright frightening... :eek: :shock:

More details through http://theaviationist.com/2012/10/19/close-call-e3/ ;)

_________________
Dutch Historic Aviation updates and (news)photos: see http://www.airnieuws.nl/phregister/484/484.html for the October issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
Yep, AR can get down-right exciting at times. Whomever was at the controls on the AWACS lost concentration for just a second and then soiled his or her flight suit in the pushover. It's hard to fault the boom operator for not calling a "breakaway" as everything happened SO quickly.

"Breakaways" themselves can be dangerous with large receiver aircraft. In fact, KC-135 aircraft commanders require a special checkout for refueling C-5's (and today, perhaps C-17's as well). The problem is that they create such a large bow wave that the wave actually pushes the 135's tail up which in turn means either the autopilot or the pilot, if hand-flying, is adding nose-up trim to compensate. A breakaway can therefore result in an extreme pitch-up for the 135.

Just glad this "incident" had a happy ending.

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:44 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: WHEW!!!!!!

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
One problem with this video is that we have no horizon reference. Watching the boom however, I'm not convinced this was pilot induced. If you watch after the boom is released back to free float, it bounces several times. I wonder if they didn't fly through some momentary CAT as they were trying to establish? SierraHotelAeronautic's Facebook feed includes a comment from a KC-135 boomer that says the KC-135 may have suffered an autopilot disconnect and was the cause, not the E-3.

Also, you hear the boomer if you listen closely say "Up, up, up!" presumably over the IC to the crew and the boom launching into the tail after that was probably the crew making a separation maneuver up and left and "throwing" the boom against the tail as the boomer had probably let go of the sticks by that point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
Craig59 wrote:
Just glad this "incident" had a happy ending.

Happy in the sense that nobody was killed, but you know there was an inquiriy later where all those involved had to 'stand tall before the man' and someone got nailed to the floorboards over this.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
After the boom disconnects, you can see the 135's tail pitch up compared to the horizon -- meaning, the 135 pitched down (probably an autopilot disconnect).

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
Randy Haskin wrote:
After the boom disconnects, you can see the 135's tail pitch up compared to the horizon -- meaning, the 135 pitched down (probably an autopilot disconnect).



I went back and watched the video again. You're right. Looks like the 135 suddenly went nose down after the boom disconnect and the E-3 pilot shoved the wheel forward to avoid a collision. I bet that was one helluva a pushover for the E-3 crew!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 178
Would the E-3 crew (in the back) be strapped in? I flew in an E-3 once and don't remember ever buckling in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
TROJANII wrote:
Would the E-3 crew (in the back) be strapped in? I flew in an E-3 once and don't remember ever buckling in.


They are equipped restraints, but I don't know what the operational rules are. I bet their coffees went all over the place. :shock:

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
maxum96 wrote:
I went back and watched the video again. You're right. Looks like the 135 suddenly went nose down after the boom disconnect and the E-3 pilot shoved the wheel forward to avoid a collision. I bet that was one helluva a pushover for the E-3 crew!

Yep, I didn't see this myself at first either. You're both apparently right.
I'd love to know what happened in the E-3, checklists, coffee and errand airmen went flying all over the place, to be sure. That was more than a few negative Gs from the way it looks. I sure hope nobody was in the can at the time, that would have gotten messy!

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:46 am
Posts: 17
Indeed, according to http://forum.scramble.nl/viewtopic.php?p=601808#p601808 medical assistence was requested by the crew while the Nato E-3 was still airborne and dumping fuel...

_________________
Dutch Historic Aviation updates and (news)photos: see http://www.airnieuws.nl/phregister/484/484.html for the October issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 248 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group