p51 wrote:
Wildchild wrote:
500$ Dumpster Dive?
More like about 700, from what I later sold and the value of the best stuff I kept. I wasn't a dive as such, more like leaning way into it while standing outside.
All the while, the museum people were laughing at me for what one person called, "rummaging through the trash just for some old manuals that aren't of any value to anyone"...
Yeah, and people like that are in charge of managing historical items at museums all over the place. And people wonder why I'm adamant that I'll never donate anything to a museum.
You definitely did the right thing. And as noble as we'd all like to think museums are, they cost money to run, and increasingly often, outsiders with business experience but zero knowledge (and worse, zero INTEREST!) of history and conservation techniques are being brought in with an eye more on the bottom line than on the messages being conveyed by the museum and it's collection. In other instances, when museum leadership changes, sometimes there is a shake-up and a re-evaluation of the museum's mission and message... and all too frequently, it turns into a complete sh|+show through some misguided, top-down effort from the new administration to "leave their mark" on the organization. Witness the furor which erupted at the NASM with the Enola Gay display back in the 90s, or the USAFM boss having their ultra-rare Bf 109G-10 (an actual II./JG 52 survivor) repainted as a JG 300 aircraft as it was "more representative of the opponents of the 8th AF", or the recent fracas up at the EAA Museum; I'm sure there are others which I'm either forgetting or haven't heard about.
In an environment like that, who can blame you for not wanting to donate outright? Who would? I know I wouldn't.
Lynn