Dan Johnson II wrote:
Leaving via the verbal high ground I see.....
I expected that result earlier. That museum has a cult going, people who think it's the best museum in the history of mankind and they don't take anything to the contrary as well. I've read from his ilk many times before. You dare not say
anything negative about the place. It's really odd, because you don't see that from other museums.
It's just a matter of audience:
*My wife loved the place, and she's the target audience, in that she has a basic understanding and most of the info is new to
her.
*But if you live and breathe the stuff and more so if you go to a museum to see historical items, it's not up to par to
many other museums and therefore not worth the hype.
It's just a matter of what your interest level is going into the place. This will dictate your overall opinion.
But folks like Dan Museum Cultist the IInd simply can't see why people in the second category feel it's not worth all the hype (or the expense, it's it's NOT cheap to get in there). When I go to a museum, I don't need the multimedia experience, I wanna see
stuff from the collection. And in that regard, the New Orleans museum fails msireably as very little of it is on display. And with people like ol' Dan backing their every move as if from the word of God, they'll never change.
Also, some of their docents give a new, scary definition to the word, "curmudgeon". One in particular shouldn't be allowed around the public. He said something to my wife when she asked a simple question that, had he been my age, I'd have knocked him flat. I seriously considered it anyway...