Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:43 am
Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:05 am
Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:05 am
Mike wrote:They are calling themselves a "National Museum", and presenting themselves as such. This should surely give them much more of an obligation to visitors than a what you are calling a "private operation opening up for tours."
Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:51 pm
Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:10 pm
TriangleP wrote:And after all, its a private museum, so its their rules.
Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:22 pm
Mike wrote:TriangleP wrote:And after all, its a private museum, so its their rules.
How can a National Museum be a private museum at the same time?
I visit many private restoration facilities. Some allow photos, some don't, some allow photos for private use only, at some I don't even ask. I have no problem with any of that.
But a 'no photography' policy at a National Museum, that I have a problem with. How would most visitors feel if the same policy was adopted at Dayton, Pensacola or in the Smithsonian. All these are also 'National Museums'.
Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:48 pm
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:05 pm
51fixer wrote:Mike wrote:TriangleP wrote:And after all, its a private museum, so its their rules.
How can a National Museum be a private museum at the same time?
I visit many private restoration facilities. Some allow photos, some don't, some allow photos for private use only, at some I don't even ask. I have no problem with any of that.
But a 'no photography' policy at a National Museum, that I have a problem with. How would most visitors feel if the same policy was adopted at Dayton, Pensacola or in the Smithsonian. All these are also 'National Museums'.
National Museum is a part of their name but it isn't a part of the Gov related Museums as you listed. i.e. having a tie in to any arm of the military or being a part of the NASM.
Their is also another National Warbird Museum I hope you won't support as a major part of their collection has a no photography allowed restriction.
That is at Midland TX and a part of the CAF collection. In the Nose Art collection gallery they have copyright restrictions and photography isn't allowed by the visitors. If you want photos you need to purchase books with them in them.
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:38 pm
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:40 pm
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:45 pm
Noha307 wrote:I'm confused, why does their Avenger have "USS Carl Vinson" painted on the tail? I double checked just to make completely sure, and I was correct - there's only one USS Carl Vinson and it's a nuke carrier. Unless the military had worse budget problems than I thought, there's no way that TBM would have been stationed on that ship.
2:42-2:44 in this video: National Musem of World War II Aviation
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:46 pm
Noha307 wrote:I'm confused, why does their Avenger have "USS Carl Vinson" painted on the tail? I double checked just to make completely sure, and I was correct - there's only one USS Carl Vinson and it's a nuke carrier. Unless the military had worse budget problems than I thought, there's no way that TBM would have been stationed on that ship.
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:46 pm
Noha307 wrote:I'm confused, why does their Avenger have "USS Carl Vinson" painted on the tail? I double checked just to make completely sure, and I was correct - there's only one USS Carl Vinson and it's a nuke carrier. Unless the military had worse budget problems than I thought, there's no way that TBM would have been stationed on that ship.
2:42-2:44 in this video: National Musem of World War II Aviation
Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:56 pm
Mike wrote:Noha307 wrote:I'm confused, why does their Avenger have "USS Carl Vinson" painted on the tail? I double checked just to make completely sure, and I was correct - there's only one USS Carl Vinson and it's a nuke carrier. Unless the military had worse budget problems than I thought, there's no way that TBM would have been stationed on that ship.
2:42-2:44 in this video: National Musem of World War II Aviation
Maybe the TBM was not stationed on the Vinson whilst in service, but that doesn't mean it hasn't flown from the ship!
Warbird Depot wrote:John Carson, who had flown TBF (TBM) Avengers during WWII, hunting U Boats in the Atlantic, bought BuAer 91453 in 1995 and went to sea again on the Nuclear Carrier Carl Vinson, CVN 67, to participate in the 50th Anniversary of the end of WWII Celebrations at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. John did not get to fly off the Carl Vinson with the other vintage aircraft, but his Avenger stayed onboard to adorn the hanger deck for the celebrations and banquets. John Carson’s name remains on the aircraft to commemorate his service to our country. Chris purchased the Avenger in 1998, along with Bill Klaers and Alan Wojciak of WestPac Restorations, and flies it at airshows throughout eastern and central USA.
Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:19 pm
Noha307 wrote:Mike wrote:Noha307 wrote:I'm confused, why does their Avenger have "USS Carl Vinson" painted on the tail? I double checked just to make completely sure, and I was correct - there's only one USS Carl Vinson and it's a nuke carrier. Unless the military had worse budget problems than I thought, there's no way that TBM would have been stationed on that ship.
2:42-2:44 in this video: National Musem of World War II Aviation
Maybe the TBM was not stationed on the Vinson whilst in service, but that doesn't mean it hasn't flown from the ship!
You're close. I don't know why I didn't think of it before, but I just googled "Avenger Carl Vinson" and found this:Warbird Depot wrote:John Carson, who had flown TBF (TBM) Avengers during WWII, hunting U Boats in the Atlantic, bought BuAer 91453 in 1995 and went to sea again on the Nuclear Carrier Carl Vinson, CVN 67, to participate in the 50th Anniversary of the end of WWII Celebrations at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. John did not get to fly off the Carl Vinson with the other vintage aircraft, but his Avenger stayed onboard to adorn the hanger deck for the celebrations and banquets. John Carson’s name remains on the aircraft to commemorate his service to our country. Chris purchased the Avenger in 1998, along with Bill Klaers and Alan Wojciak of WestPac Restorations, and flies it at airshows throughout eastern and central USA.