redvanner wrote:
Well, of course you may be right. Maybe I do underestimate the will of people to destroy the enemy´s machinery of war. Maybe I do overestimate the common aviator´s sense of being members of the same caste. Maybe I should read Scharff´s and Godfrey´s books. That might make me wiser, or at least show some new aspects I am missing.
Michael
Or you could be right and I could be wrong. It's a wonderful relationship that the Germans seem to have had with the Americans and the British. Such a gentlemanly approach to war.
Can you imagine in the Pacific, if the USAAF captured a Japanese pilot, would they invite him to take a spin in a P-38 or P-51 over the field? Heck, maybe some old vet told Jack Cook that it happened, in which case we would have to accept it as Fact; but it seems doubtful to me that it would have occurred. Knowing the culture, and what was at stake for the Japanese, the Americans would be too worried about the kind of scenario I outlined.
Or a German-USSR combination, also hard to imagine. Those countries fought a no-holds-barred war that seems different from the one we fought with the Germans.
Especially big of the Germans, when you think of it. "Yes, this fellow protected the bombers that roasted my sister, fiancee, and mother-in-law in the firestorms of Dresden, but he still deserves a flip in a 109. Care for some beer and sausages afterward?" Really, they were such ripping good sports.
To put it in perspective, fast forward to today. Imagine if we were enduring 10 World Trade Center bombings every day and we captured a terrorist getting ready to fly one of the planes. Would we say, "Well, you've been through pilot training so you're a fellow aviator, and you trained with Al Qaida so you're a fellow soldier. I feel honor and kinship with you. Would you like to take a 787 for a little jaunt around Seattle?"
Different times, I guess.
August