Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:21 pm
 .... I'll have to give this thread just a little longer to reload, I may have to re-post them. Sorry about that. This is what I get for having all my software and image files transferred to a new system all at once. I'll make it up to ya's
  .... I'll have to give this thread just a little longer to reload, I may have to re-post them. Sorry about that. This is what I get for having all my software and image files transferred to a new system all at once. I'll make it up to ya's   
  
			
		Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:19 am
Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:30 pm



 
			
		Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:45 pm

Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:52 pm
lmritger wrote:
This is actually the Bell XP-39 with a prop thrust rake mounted on the nose, undergoing flight tests from NACA Langley... hence the non-standard prop as well.
Lynn
 
			
		Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:23 am
maxum96 wrote:Awesome pictures! Thanks for posting.
I think that might be NAS North Island. But with the B-36's in the background it might be Lindbergh field. Convair's plant was at Lindbergh Field.
Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:17 am



 
			
		Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:25 am
Mark Allen M wrote:A few more 'aerial 82 candy'
Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:30 pm
Rajay wrote:maxum96 wrote:Awesome pictures! Thanks for posting.
I think that might be NAS North Island. But with the B-36's in the background it might be Lindbergh field. Convair's plant was at Lindbergh Field.
According to Wikipedia, only the original proof of concept mockup of the B-36 was built in San Diego and all of the actual production was carried out in Ft. Worth, TX adjacent to what eventually became Carswell AFB.
Ironically in terms of this photo, that same Wikipedia article (about the Convair B-36 Peacemaker in particular - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_B-36) mentions that the US Navy challenged the Air Force's claim that the B-36 could fly too high to be intercepted (stripped down to a "featherweight" configuration, it was supposedly capable of flying as high as 55,000 feet!) The Navy proposed a "duel" exercise in which they would attempt an actual intercept of a B-36 with some of their F2H Banshee fighters. Apparently, the USAF declined to participate in the challenge.
Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:20 pm
Rajay wrote:Mark Allen M wrote:A few more 'aerial 82 candy'
Now, just who in the heck would NACA be trying to bomb? And what kinda weapon or test bed is that on the centerline?
Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:28 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:A few more 'aerial 82 candy'