My humble opinion, so we will not agree on like or don't like the CAF brand mark. I do feel that it is becoming a mark that will do what CAF has intended. Purists will only want the birds to look authentic but then argue about whether the paint scheme is appropriate.
I agree that we need to find a way to get more young blood into the organization. In our case with the Wisconsin Wing, we support two aircraft, a PT-26 with 14 pilot sponsors and an SNJ-5 with three. We have 14 new members who have joined us this year. We do a lot of shows with our PX that is very successful in generating funds for our wing. We are a fairly social group that has a lot of activities. All is benefited by the fact that we have about 12 non-CAF warbirds here at KUES so the culture is good.
I think the CAF can be what you make it. Decal or no, I would not be a pilot sponsor if the CAF did not allow us to fly their equipment. My Pop was a WWII fighter pilot flying P-47's and P-38's in CBI. He trained in PT-19 in San Antonio so my PT-26 time means something to me. In time, I will move to the SNJ (T-6) also one of Dad's trainers. Life is good.
Don't lose sight of the fact that pilot sponsorship, membership, and donations are tax deductible. We have non-member volunteers as well. If you want to be a part of our wing, we will accept you with open arms. So, make the CAF be what you want it to be. A provider of historic aircraft for you to enjoy and capitalize on or a pissing contest about former names and "tramp stamps". Your choice, I made mine.
