JohnB wrote:
I'll reply with a similar statement to what I said about Pearl Harbor...
Yes, it's bad CGI...BUT anything that helps expose young people to what went on in the war can't be all bad.
How many HS kids have Roger Freeman's books? Not many. More kids know more about Ford Mustangs than the North American variety.
If you want the vet's story to continue, you have to expose young people to it. Any film that tells teenagers about Jimmy Doolittle is a good thing...even if he's played by Alec (nasty temper) Baldwin. And yes, George Lucas has to answer to for his historic liberties in Red Tails.
PH took liberties in the name of box office (young characters who managed to fly in the BoB and B-25s, sex and silly stunts)...Lucas took liberties in the name civil rights history. Both are less than ideal, but neither are surprising given Hollywood's track record with historical films and biographies.
I'd imagine a lot of new/young film makers make similar inexpensive "Demo" films to get studio or investor interest.
Cut them some slack...
I agree with this statement 100%! It does suck that it's so god awful and that they stole sounds effects from other movies, you can hear the radio sound that was in memphis belle as mother and country is going down when the camera guy walks into the raio room and sees the R/O laying there dead. Just before that the guy yelling mama, that from saving private ryan.
BUT, these movies are helping me to teach my kids about history conected to the airplanes they see at the airshows. Me and my two sons watched pearl harbor today. They were going going back and forth calling out the a/c types in the movie. They got a better idea of the history of the attack from this movie, and maybe, just maybe the interest in history will stay with them into adulthood. And for that, inacuracies in movies that give an idea of the history of the events depicted are worth it.