This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:05 pm
IIRC, and it has been a while. That's XE 501, one of the Boeing wing A-6's. I worked on that bird.......
When the Navy decided it no longer wanted them, They were dragged out into the desert and used as targets. Cheaper than flying them to DM. One did get saved, and is on display at the base museum.
Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:22 pm
There's also the remains of some kind of patrol boat on the east side of the range. Can't tell what it was originally.
Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:26 pm
I was told that it was a drug boat or some such. Confiscated by some agency. The Navy needed a similar type vessel for a target, so it was shipped up here.
Rumor control had it, a mission was planned and the target was a fishing boat......like that one.
This was back in the days when we did things like that.
Now we send aid packages!
Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:51 pm
n/t
Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:15 pm
SaxMan wrote:There's also the remains of some kind of patrol boat on the east side of the range. Can't tell what it was originally.
from
http://www.chinalakealumni.org/1995/1995.htm
This was it, old hydro foil, ex navy ex passenger boat 'Gulf Streak'
Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:36 pm
The B-29's still at China Lake ranges 1995 from
http://www.chinalakealumni.org/1995/1995.htmThe one at airport lake s/n 44-69957


The Echo range one s/n 44-62134


Both in the same locations/condition visible on new Google Earth images
This one was at airport lake just south of 44-69957 in 1995
Now in the museum compound, I/D as Here's Hopin 44-70102
Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:52 pm
Why the heck did I get fixated on a B24? I knew the danged thing was a B29 the whole time
Must have been the divorce messing with my head.
Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:38 pm
Why is the Navy so against warbirds? I mean if someone finds a Corsair the navy wont let them recover it ect. Why is it that way? Did somone p*SS off the Navy or are they just jerks who'd rather see everything rot?
Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:22 pm
muddyboots wrote:Why the heck did I get fixated on a B24? I knew the danged thing was a B29 the whole time
Must have been the divorce messing with my head.
Maybe you wanted to see a B-24. I know I would. I'd hope to discover one of those rare animals, way out there. Knowing that their we're B-29's there, only made it that much more possible. Would be amazing to see one recovered fairly intact.
Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:50 pm
Very interesting thread.
the layout of some sites look familiar in as much as they appear to be VIP Protection training sites and or anti terror training areas.
could explain the numerous "go away" responses people seem to get.
But what I wanted to say, which maybe obvious to most is, this thread, plus what's left of Kee Bird plus some other sites and collections that retain B-29
remains, doesn't that justify the effort to perhaps create another B-29? even if its a static? These wrecks, hulks, scrap heaps are now officially "Heritage" items
and perhaps that's an angle that cold be explored? just a few thoughts, back to you.
Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:37 am
Digger wrote:Very interesting thread.
the layout of some sites look familiar in as much as they appear to be VIP Protection training sites and or anti terror training areas.
could explain the numerous "go away" responses people seem to get.
But what I wanted to say, which maybe obvious to most is, this thread, plus what's left of Kee Bird plus some other sites and collections that retain B-29
remains, doesn't that justify the effort to perhaps create another B-29? even if its a static? These wrecks, hulks, scrap heaps are now officially "Heritage" items
and perhaps that's an angle that cold be explored? just a few thoughts, back to you.
Yes, interesting topic. As for the B-29's I think it is pretty clear that what is left on the range at China Lake would make less than an airframe, and would be a major project. Perhaps efforts could be better spent on getting the complete airframes that do survive into better shape and indoors. Several B-29's on oudoor display are marginal and may not survive much longer without help. The ones at Tinker, Hill and Barksdale arguably are those that need the most help. Some are stipped inside. There are also two in desert storage (one for sale!). Perhaps the B-29 "Lady of the Lake" in Alaska would be worth a more detailed look.
Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:29 pm
Thanks for that feedback, being in Australia and therefore making me an observer gives me limited information to what's possible and what's not.
but I most certainly agree that a priority list should guide any response to aircraft preservation, perhaps a hybrid B-29 could be made from all the bits and pieces
with an intent to replace one of those you have suggested is more worthy of attention. Nevertheless its a great thread and I have gleaned a lot of valuable insights
from the comments. Just sad to see these remains apparently wasting away.
Thu Jan 16, 2014 6:41 pm
Just adding a couple of more comments.
I've chatted with a few B-17 and B-29 collectors of recent, people like Bruce Orriss, does he still have that B-29 nose section?
Perhaps an good old fashioned parts drive (media coverage and radio, warbird publications) could also bring about some interesting items currently locked away or stored in a barn and forgotten about.
anyway, I'm sure these and other ideas have been considered especially when comparing the cost of travelling to Guam or other far off distant places, when a lot could be collected within the mainland states.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.