This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:43 am
Seems to me that would be among the most straightforward of necessary warbird restorations, given the ubiquitous nature of Cessna parts. I'm assuming like everything else, it's a matter of funding?
Lynn
Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:45 pm
Sadly, most aviation technical colleges don't really care about the ex-military aircraft they receive. To them, they're teaching aids , nothing more,.
The one here had a T-33, F-86H parts taken from a MD-ANG example given to a local school and H-23...plus a neat teaching rig made out of H-23 rotor system...back in the 70s, they're all gone now. Currently, they have bits of a couple of O-2s about. Over at Grant County airport they have a very nice TH-13T...but it doesn't fly along with bits of H-13 wreckage and a stripped non-flying Huey.
A local Church-sponsored aviation school has a ex-Army U-21...a non pressurized King Air as a trainer. they teach students how to maintain PT-6s with it. It's still in its Army colors, but someone has painted its windows so they look round, giving it the look of a King Air. It looks to be in great shape.
Few of these aircraft will ever be restored or valued as warbirds. For many, it's just a decades long delay to the scrap yard.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:42 pm
A Mescalero wouldn't cruise at "148 mph" if you dropped it out of a C-130.
Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:17 pm
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:A Mescalero wouldn't cruise at "148 mph" if you dropped it out of a C-130.
Here is the chart at 7,500, you would have to get to 9,500 to see 147 mph. My T-41B is a little faster than my C-177B 180 hp Cardinal was. I flight planed 140 mph on it. The T-41B is a lot faster than a normal 172 due to the 210 hp and constant speed prop.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.