fotobass wrote:
tom d. friedman wrote:
to many gray areas as to provenience, for starters non matching gun part components.
Wouldn't you think that having matching serial numbered parts in one of the NMUSAF's .50's would seem to make sense? It would seem to me pretty plausible that guns would have been cleaned/worked on at the same time, and that parts could have easily been interchanged?
I thought about this too. "What if" the 50's on several unit aircraft were worked on at the same time and then reinstalled back into different planes sometime prior to the mission(s)? If I was going to drop the big bucks down for this thing as a buyer of confirmed, authentic items, I'm kinda having a hard time convincing myself with 100% certainty....without a doubt....there is no way.....it's impossible.....there was anyway this 50 could have come from another aircraft that was at the same unit this aircraft came from. My due diligence warning light is flashing here. The GQ alarm would be sounding if it just so happened there was another 50 somewhere out there that had this one's s/n's mixed in it.....especially if all the guns from this crashed aircraft were already accounted for. I'd sleep better at night if I seen a picture that could place this exact 50 at that exact crash site. Typed statements are nice, but.....
The matching 1943 50 cal tripod for auction was kinda cool though.