Steve T wrote:
I like this one:

But this P-40, too, represents a different bird in a different theatre than what it actually was. It's an RNZAF P-40N-1 Kittyhawk IV, beautifully restored to represent a 260 Sqn RAF P-40M Kittyhawk III flown in North Africa by Canadian ace James Edwards. Most refreshingly, of course...look Ma, no sharkmouth!
No comment yet on the Kalamazoo P-40N...which I will candidly admit was always a favourite of mine...
S.
I love the Air Zoo P-40 scheme too. Of course, I grew up spending two Saturday's a month at the museum when I was a kid, so I'm biased. I think it would be an absolute travesty if that aircraft was ever repainted. Suzie Parish was a local legend (not just in aviation), and the aircraft is a great tribute to her legacy. I'm not aware of this aircraft having combat history, so it's not like anything is being neglected there.
It would be nice if museums had more respect for the history of their airframes, particularly if they saw significant action or combat. Unfortunately, that's not always the case. The purpose of museums is not only to educate, but to preserve- but they do have to make money while doing it. I think oftentimes the public is done a disservice because museums choose the most convenient story to tell/sell, rather than focus on the specific story of their artifact. The good thing about paint schemes is that they can be changed. It's not as if this aircraft is permanently ruined by the paint scheme. Hopefully the restoration and the original markings were carefully documented so that story is not lost though, because THAT would be a shame.
That's as far as I'm going with this one. I'm very happy to see another P-40 restored and on display. Perhaps one day it can be repainted in another scheme to tell a different story. Hats off to the restoration team for all their hard work and getting it ready for display.