Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:33 pm
Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:55 am
Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:56 am
tom d. friedman wrote:when I went to punta cana / Dominican republic I was going to take a martini break & go warbirding by hiring a driver. I was strongly advised by members of this board & domincan citizens / resort staff not to do so. I complied. that area is just to unstable for more than American gringos.
Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:23 pm
Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:42 am
davidwomacks wrote:Why do they hate us? What has the US done to them? I honestly don't know which is why I'm asking .
Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:34 pm
Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:30 pm
WIXMOD-Charlie wrote:No politics on WIX please guys.
Wed Feb 26, 2014 4:03 pm
CoastieJohn wrote:WIXMOD-Charlie wrote:No politics on WIX please guys.
Sorry...I didn't see that as political. I was just relaying my experience and observations from working down there and how I would approach the PBY in question.
Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:32 am
Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:25 am
Warbird Kid wrote:CoastieJohn wrote:WIXMOD-Charlie wrote:No politics on WIX please guys.
Sorry...I didn't see that as political. I was just relaying my experience and observations from working down there and how I would approach the PBY in question.
Ditto, it wasn't really anything more than what the current situation is with REGARDS TO RETRIEVING VINTAGE AIRCRAFT.
Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:30 pm
Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:35 pm
Thu Feb 27, 2014 8:26 pm
CoastieJohn wrote:I don't know myself....someone else may though.
Been talking offline with some smart folks who are very knowledgeable on these things. The thought is the various plates on it make it suspect as to the authenticity of it being what it says it is (BuNo 34012).
Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:30 pm
Chris Brame wrote:CoastieJohn wrote:I don't know myself....someone else may though.
Been talking offline with some smart folks who are very knowledgeable on these things. The thought is the various plates on it make it suspect as to the authenticity of it being what it says it is (BuNo 34012).
I was wondering about that since (a) 34012 is a -5, not a -6, number and (b) see the Registry: http://www.warbirdregistry.org/pbyregis ... 34012.html
What's involved with changing a -5 tail to -6? Is it a bolt-on deal?
First off, even though it has a tall tail, IT IS NOT A CONSOILDATED PBY-6A......!
BUNO 34012 was one of a batch of 100 PBY-5A machines manufactured under a contract for the USN (BUNOs 33960 - 34059) of which a total of 31 went directly to the USAAF under serial numbers 43-43839 thru 863 and 43-47956 thru 962 as OA-10-COs.
BUNO 34012 "WAS" a former USCG PBY-5A/-5AG machine. It entered on duty with the CG on 02/11/46 and remained operational until 03/21/52, when it was listed as retired & sold as surplus to the needs of the USCG.
Based on my experience with ID plates, it would appear the machine went to the RCAF where it was modified with the replacement of the vertical tail feathers. It also appears the tail mod was completed by Canadian Vickers as the plate shows the type aircraft as a model 28B - - - the internal Consolidated Aircraft Company model designator for their tall-tail PBY-6A model. It also appears that the basis for the mod was based on drawings provided by Consolidated. Additionally, the "Vickers' Plate" displays the approval stamps of the CV and RCAF inspectors. Canadian Vickers Limited was a major producer and modification facility of the Canadian PBY machines with their airframe types identified as PBV followed by the model number.
The next plate indicates that the aircraft was modified in Atlanta, GA by CONVAIR, or an agent of same in March 1955. This mod most likely consisted of the de-militarizing of the entire airframe (removal of nose turret, waist blisters, addition of the rear air-stair, and other items the new owner(s) desired.
The next plate, in Spanish, was most likely added to the airframe by the Colombian Air Force after they became the owner of the machine. The date on that plate indicates the year 1994.
Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:26 am