Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 10:43 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Do we know for certain that MoF intend to display the Connie undercover, or is this pure speculation? Looking at their website, larger airframes such as the Concorde and VC-137 seem to be left outside at present, so my guess is that the the intention is that the Connie would be left outside.

Not that I think that MoF is not an appropriate home for it, mind you. I had a few beers in this one when it was in use as a bar outside the Regal Constellation Hotel in Toronto in around 1996-7, so it will be good to see it going to a major collection, as it seems to have had something of a chequered history since those days.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
Ryan Keough wrote:
I hate to be a bit of a devils advocate here... I mean, the B-29 and the Concorde are still outside from what I remember... I think the B-47 too.
Ryan


Last time I was there, 2-27-05, the only one of those planes outside was the Concorde...along with the 737, 747 prototypes and a ex-AA 727-200 and the VC-137B. Along with a F-14 and AV-8A.

If the aviation history community expects ALL the airliners to be placed under roof, the museum will have to sell half their collection to buy a building large enough for the 747, Concorde, etc. Both of which are more historic airframes than a run of the mill ex-bar Connie.

What I'd like to see them do is move the Comet 4 , B-52G, and 727 prototype down from Paine Field for display with the other jets.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:53 am 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
No, the Connie will be displayed outside. Here is part of a post from an email list I am on.

Quote:
The Museum of Flight has responded to many of the questions surrounding
its acquisition of L1049G CF-RNR on their website
http://www.museumofflight.org/FileUploa ... nieRTQ.pdf

Also, a photo of CF-RNR taken 31 January 2006
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1001876/L/


I am not so sure that it would be worse off outside in Seattle rather than Toronto. They do seem to take care of their collection in Seattle.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Last edited by mrhenniger on Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:54 am 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
JBoyle wrote:
What I'd like to see them do is move the Comet 4 , B-52G, and 727 prototype down from Paine Field for display with the other jets.


There is not much space at Boeing field for more airframes. Even the airliners are across the road in a Boeing parking lot.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:00 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
mrhenniger wrote:
No the Connie will not be outside. Here is part of a post from an email list I am on.


The Museum of Flight - Response to Questions wrote:
The Constellation will be reassembled in place in the Museum's Airpark, an outdoor gallery on the Museum's main campus in Seattle.


I'd say that this is pretty conclusive in saying that the Connie WILL be displayed outside, Mike.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:59 am 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Mike wrote:
I'd say that this is pretty conclusive in saying that the Connie WILL be displayed outside, Mike.


Ooopss... I still was awake when I posted that. :oops: I will edit my post.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:10 pm
Posts: 279
Location: The Prior
So out of all those historical aircraft currently stored outdoors at the Seattle Museum....will any eventually make it indoors or under cover in the future???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:01 pm 
Offline
WRG Associate Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:40 pm
Posts: 1238
Location: Stow, MA
Andrew Semon wrote:
So out of all those historical aircraft currently stored outdoors at the Seattle Museum....will any eventually make it indoors or under cover in the future???


I seem to remember seeing a master plan somewhere that had a facility being built across the road, connected by a skyway, where the commercial jets and large aircraft would be. I am not sure if that master plan is still valid or where it sits in the scheme of things. I know a lot of museums create the plans and usually have some sort of pretty model in the lobby to help spur donations, but I have seen very few actually get realized on the scale they present...

However, I feel that a master plan is a heck of a great idea... all organizations need a direction!

Ryan Keough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
mrhenniger wrote:
There is not much space at Boeing field for more airframes. Even the airliners are across the road in a Boeing parking lot.

Mike


I know, I've been there...but they must have some space if they want to add the Connie.

Besides, seeing the first 727, 737 and 747 in one place would be neat.
BTW: Boeing also has the first 757 (as a F-22 avionics test bed) and the 767 as an Army project, so some day I'd love to see those too.
Also, the Comet deserves a place of honor at the main museum...heck so does the 52.

Hopefully, it's a large parking lot.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
Ryan Keough wrote:
Andrew Semon wrote:
I know a lot of museums create the plans and usually have some sort of pretty model in the lobby to help spur donations, but I have seen very few actually get realized on the scale they present...

However, I feel that a master plan is a heck of a great idea... all organizations need a direction!

Ryan Keough


Hi Ryan,
I'd agree in general. But it would be unfair not to acknowledge those museums that have built a new facility and a big one too...
NASM
CWH (Probably the most spectacular 'phoenix from the ashes' to date)
Canadian Aviation Museum
Le Bourget
Nowra in NSW, Australia

And places like Shuttleworth, RAF Museum Hendon and the Fleet Air Arm Museum Yeovilton have been steadily adding buildings to cover more aircraft over the past 20 - 30 years.

Still, I'm going to make a model hangar with a plane outside with a slot in the top for my front room now... :D

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:10 pm
Posts: 279
Location: The Prior
Are the Paine Field and Seattle museum's collections both owned by Boeing? And if so why keep them separate? Is limited space the main reason....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:03 am 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
See this new thread...
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... 3134#53134
...for a summary of the Museum of Flight locations.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:41 am 
Offline
WRG Associate Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:40 pm
Posts: 1238
Location: Stow, MA
Andrew Semon wrote:
Are the Paine Field and Seattle museum's collections both owned by Boeing? And if so why keep them separate? Is limited space the main reason....


The Museum of Flight is an independent non-profit entity and is only tied to Boeing through the generous support Boeing gives to the museum due to its proximity to the bulk of the company at Boeing Field and Everett. It has always fought the perception that it is a Boeing owned entity.

The nature of Boeing Field gives it little expansion room "on airport" as most of the available space is occupied by Boeing and other ventures. Everett is much more open to expansion and growth (just look at the aerial view, it is almost labrynth-like). I would assume that the combination of limited hangar space and tight corporate security in the Boeing hangars at Boeing Field keeps the restoration facility at Everett. Additionally I believe that the B-17F N17W "Boeing Bee" that was formerly of the Bob Richardson collection resides at the Boeing Facility at Renton... awaiting an appropriate "under cover" display at Boeing Field.

Ryan Keough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:26 am 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Ryan Keough wrote:
Additionally I believe that the B-17F N17W "Boeing Bee" that was formerly of the Bob Richardson collection resides at the Boeing Facility at Renton... awaiting an appropriate "under cover" display at Boeing Field.


Unless you know something I don't, I was told that the B-17 is stored in one of the Boeing hangers on Boeing field. Renton is yet another airfield in the Seattle area and is south-east of Boeing field. 737 production is at Renton.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Last edited by mrhenniger on Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:26 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Raven wrote:
I'd agree in general. But it would be unfair not to acknowledge those museums that have built a new facility and a big one too...

Le Bourget

??? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group