Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 9:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 1:42 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
The Boeing XF8B (Model 400) was a single-engine aircraft developed by Boeing during World War II to provide the United States Navy a long-range shipboard fighter aircraft. The XF8B was intended for operation against the Japanese home islands from aircraft carriers outside the range of Japanese land-based aircraft. Designed for various roles including interceptor, long-range escort fighter, dive-bomber and torpedo bomber, the final design embodied a number of innovative features in order to accomplish the various roles. Despite its formidable capabilities, the XF8B-1 was fated to never enter series production.
The XF8B-1 was, at the time, the largest and heaviest single-seat, single-engine fighter developed in the United States. Boeing called the XF8B-1 optimistically, the "five-in-one fighter" (fighter, interceptor, dive bomber, torpedo bomber, or level bomber). It was powered by a single 3,000 hp (2,200 kW) Pratt & Whitney XR-4360-10 four-row 28-cylinder radial engine, driving two three-bladed contra-rotating propellers. It would be the largest single-seat piston fighter to fly in the U.S. to date. The large wings featured outer sections which could fold vertically, while the fuselage incorporated an internal bomb bay and large fuel tanks; more fuel could be carried externally. The proposed armament included six 0.50 inch (12.7 mm) machine guns or six 20 mm wing-mounted cannons, and a 6,400 lb (2,900 kg) bomb load or two 2,000 lb (900 kg) torpedoes. The final configuration was a large but streamlined design, featuring a bubble canopy, sturdy main undercarriage that folded into the wings, and topped by a variation on the B-29 vertical tail.

The contract for three prototypes (BuNos 57984–57986) was awarded 4 May 1943, although only one was completed before the war ended. It first flew in November 1944. The two remaining prototypes were completed after the war, with the third (BuNo 57986) evaluated at Eglin Air Force Base by the United States Army Air Forces.

To expedite testing and evaluation, a second cockpit was fitted to the first two prototypes to allow a flight engineer to help monitor the test flights. The second seat was easily accommodated in the roomy cockpit.

Although testing of the promising XF8B concept continued into 1946 by the USAAF and 1947 by the US Navy, the end of the war in the Pacific and changing postwar strategy required that Boeing concentrate on building large land-based bombers and transports. The advent of jet fighters led to the cancellation of many wartime piston-engined projects; consequently, since the USAF lost interest in pursuing the project and the U.S. Navy was only prepared to offer a small contract, Boeing chose to wind down the XF8B program. Tests at Boeing Field were marred by an accident in which a test pilot accidentally retracted his landing gear on final approach. Investigation later found this to have been caused by a faulty micro switch. This occurred just as first shift was ending, and as many workers watched from the Plant 2 steps, the XF8B-1 bellied onto the concrete of Boeing Field. As the test program was concluded, the prototypes were scrapped one by one, with 57986 lingering on into 1950.
Source of text and photos, Duggy at Axis & Allied paintworks.

Image
XF8B-1 over Seattle area

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1

Image
XF8B-1 Boeing Field in Seattle WA

Image
XF8B-1 Boeing Field Seattle WA

Image
XF8B-1NAS Patuxent River MD storage area

Image
XF8B-1

Image
Cockpit interior of XF8B-1

Image
Instrument Panel of XF8B-1

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 2:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
I'm aware of the aircraft through Peter M. Bower's book, Boeing Aircraft Since 1916 and other works.

I've never seen it in bare metal finish.

Note it has the "back and fold flat" wheels l that Boeing developed in the 30s and licensed it to Curtiss for use on the P-40s (...and possibly Douglas & Vought as well?).

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:56 am
Posts: 843
Nice machine ... looks like a Super Sea Fury... :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 8:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 1274
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
I like it! Thanks for sharing those, Mark!

_________________
Curator - EAA Aviation Museum, Oshkosh, WI
"Let No Story Go Untold!"
http://www.timelessvoices.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
I sometimes wonder how fighter aircraft would have evolved if the jet engine had never been invented. Pretty sure something like this would have been at least the next generation. This, and a larger Mustang, Griffon-powered. Or perhaps twin-engine fighters along the lines of the Tigercat would have become the norm.

Cool airplane, and you have several pics of it I've never seen before. Thanks! :supz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 9:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
The F8B had a 54 foot wingspan...identical to the TBM Avenger. That should give you a good concept of its size!

2800 mile range with a 432 mph top speed and the ability to carry 6,400 pounds of ordinance -- that is incredibly impressive for a plane that size. The Skyraider and Mauler could both lift more, but the F8B was 100 mph faster than the Skyraider and about 70 mph faster than Mauler.

The F8B was to prop-driven aircraft what the F-111 was to jet powered ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2014 11:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
I think we can tell where the draftsman from the B-17 and B-29 dorsal fin project ended up

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 5:30 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1263
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Did this one ultimately become Pax River landfill, too?

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 6:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
Matt Gunsch wrote:
I think we can tell where the draftsman from the B-17 and B-29 dorsal fin project ended up

It also kinda looks like the love child of a Skyraider and a Bearcat. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:01 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1198
A neat plane indeed. IIRC the contra-rotating prop was deemed to have a hypnotic/nauseating effect on the pilot, and was deemed to be of concern for long duration flights. Did any other contraprops like the griffon spit have this effect?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:30 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
Looks like it a graft of:
Mustang wing tips
Bearcat canopy
B-29 dorsal fin
A bit of Sea fury-ness
A bit of Skyraider-ness

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 7:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:10 am
Posts: 48
sandiego89 wrote:
A neat plane indeed. IIRC the contra-rotating prop was deemed to have a hypnotic/nauseating effect on the pilot, and was deemed to be of concern for long duration flights. Did any other contraprops like the griffon spit have this effect?


Griffon powered Spit with contraprops???? Never heard of such a beast.
The Griffon turns the opposite way to a Merlin, but as far as I know (not an expert mind you) they only ever had one prop.

Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
tacoope wrote:
sandiego89 wrote:
A neat plane indeed. IIRC the contra-rotating prop was deemed to have a hypnotic/nauseating effect on the pilot, and was deemed to be of concern for long duration flights. Did any other contraprops like the griffon spit have this effect?


Griffon powered Spit with contraprops???? Never heard of such a beast.
The Griffon turns the opposite way to a Merlin, but as far as I know (not an expert mind you) they only ever had one prop.

Terry

Well, just off the top of my head, the Seafire 47 had contraprops.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 9:02 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1198
tacoope wrote:
sandiego89 wrote:
A neat plane indeed. IIRC the contra-rotating prop was deemed to have a hypnotic/nauseating effect on the pilot, and was deemed to be of concern for long duration flights. Did any other contraprops like the griffon spit have this effect?


Griffon powered Spit with contraprops???? Never heard of such a beast.
The Griffon turns the opposite way to a Merlin, but as far as I know (not an expert mind you) they only ever had one prop.

Terry


Several marks of the spitfire/seafire had contra-props with Griffons. Some mk 21, f22, f24, seafire 46, 47, some other ones offs.

Google spitfire contraprops and you will see some great images of the XIX at chino with the griffon from a shack.

examples from this source: http://freespace.virgin.net/john.dell/spits.htm#mk21 :
mark 21, F21: although a few were fitted with the Griffon 85 with six blades in two sets of three rotating in different directions (known as a contra-rotating propeller) to use fully the 2,375 hp of the Griffon.

Seafire 47: Seafire 47 had folding wings operated by hydraulics and the Big Griffon 87 or 88 (2,375 hp) was fitted with contra-rotating propellers.

Don't want to derail the XF8B thread, and get into a spitfire mark/mk debate, but was just curious if any other contra-props had this strobotic effect on the pilot. Spitfire, Gannet, some air racers, others?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 5:29 am
Posts: 115
Location: NAS Pax River
Thanks for sharing the pics. I've never seen any of the Navy ones before.

That thing must of had a pretty awesome sound to it!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kalamazookid and 256 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group