Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:23 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:04 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Quote:
After its salt water bath thanks to the hurricane a full restoration to fly just wasn't ever going to happen.


The PB4Y wasn't inundated. The water line on the aircraft was 6 ft from the hangar floor. The overhauled R2600s , turrets, etc... weren't even close to getting wet.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:49 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Here is one I took of C30 in the 80s when it was still active
Image

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 8:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
Slight deviation.....

Has anyone spoke to the NPS about recovering this Atka B-24 for a rebuild? Granted it's a registered historic artifact but it seems like a waste to let it sit and weather away to the elements. IMO it would be better served as a historic artifact in a museum vs sitting where it's at.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 131
Photo of it taken in 1978.

Image

_________________
Chris Kennedy
Peoria, AZ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:01 pm
Posts: 262
... hauling retardant at Hemet, CA (HMT) ...Nov. 1980

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 11:34 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Breaks my heart that this one will not be returned to airworthiness. Pima will do a great job with it though. I'm hoping for a late war tri-color scheme myself. :) Say a ship from Tinian… :)

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:36 pm
Posts: 336
Wow they would fly it with ladder on, never saw that before. Wonder what the trim up was like


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 1:00 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
Not going to fly, such a shame. Can Pima start flying airplanes that CAN fly, please?

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 3:46 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2491
Location: New Zealand
Nathan wrote:
Not going to fly, such a shame. Can Pima start flying airplanes that CAN fly, please?


I am sure if you pony up the $$$$$ they will consider it ;-)

_________________
Classic Wings Magazine

https://www.classicwings.com/

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ClassicWingsMagazine/

Preserved Axis Aircraft

http://www.classicwings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2015 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:03 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Mesa, Arizona USA
Pima will do an awesome job of moving and restoring this airplane, and it will be nice to see it return to Arizona where she spent so much of her lifetime and working career. I, for one, can't wait to see her in Tucson.

The AZ based group currently flying a PB4Y-2 was offered this airplane from Lone Star earlier this year and had spent some time in Galveston looking at the airplane and seriously contemplating the acquisition of yet another project.

It was a very difficult decision... there was initial talk of acquiring it for restoration related parts (e.g. farming it of turrets and components) to be incorporated into N2871G or even acquiring as a second and independent restoration project and operating it as well. In the end, passing on the offer for acquisition so that the next heir apparent - PASM - could make a go of it - seemed to be the most logical and thoughtful decision.

Lone Star staff and volunteers had spent so much time, effort and money restoring the airplane to its pre-hurricane condition it seemed downright improper to acquire it as an "organ donor" for spare parts. This would have further doomed an already rare and very unique airframe.

While most of it was a huge financial consideration - the costs associated with the spar AD and repair work + engines and props ( x 4) + wiring and other sundry details would have pushed the project into the $500,000 range in addition to acquisition cost, there was also a large personal component to the decision. The chief pilot of N2871G - Woody Grantham - had several thousand hours in this very airplane when it was operated by his former company and he did not wish to see it parted out, pared down or further diminished. There was a great degree of respect and sentimental feelings for this "old girl" who'd spent so many productive years with him.

Staff of LSFM did a great job on this airplane and their decision to part with her was never an easy one. The Arizona group appreciated the opportunity as offered them, and upon hearing Pima had both interest and the ability to procure and display her in current condition, the decision was obvious.

As to whether BuNo. 66302 will acquire turrets and other combat related items for the airplane as their restoration evolves, time will tell. Some of these original parts have already been procured by team and are in storage pending that decision. For now, owners are satisfied operating in Coast Guard configuration, the service branch where the airplane spent most of its military career.

Let's congratulate Pima for stepping up to the challenge to do what they are doing and the huge undertaking at hand. They'll do a superb job with her, and the legacy of Charlie 30 will live on. Flying or static, I think it's a win-win deal for everyone.

- Robert in PHX


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 722
Location: Tucson, AZ
Any update on the time for the move to PASM?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:24 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
dirtysidedown430 wrote:
Wow they would fly it with ladder on, never saw that before. Wonder what the trim up was like


Back in the late 70s I worked at the Boise airport.
A PB4Y cane in one day and I used the external ladder to look inside the cockpit.
Interesting, and I thought it was neat that the aircraft was so slow (or should I say didn't need to go fast) that the boarding ladder was permanently attached to the airframe.

I wish I had the ID of that ac. Might have been the same one...but I think it had a much cruder nose piece.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:59 pm
Posts: 58
All seven of Hawkins & Powers Aviation's tanked '4Ys had external ladders (seven rungs).

T-121, T-122, T-123, T-124, T-125 were all former Coast Guard airplanes.

The early "ladder" set up on some of their PB4Y's even included handrails, although I am not certain how many of the airplanes had them. Later, the fleet was standardized with the seven rung set up without handrails.

T-126 and T-127 were both former U.S. Navy birds and were never transferred over to the USCG. The "cruder nose piece" you referred to could very well be one of these two airplanes. When H&P removed the turret for conversion to an airtanker, they replaced it with sheet metal and the used the canopy out of either a T-28 or an F-86, (can't remember), mounted vertically, which completed the nose piece.

Craig


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 1:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 915
Location: ELP
I look forward to seeing them in Arizona. I look forward to seeing them in transit.

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 7:12 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1199
N4073F wrote:
All seven of Hawkins & Powers Aviation's tanked '4Ys had external ladders (seven rungs).

T-121, T-122, T-123, T-124, T-125 were all former Coast Guard airplanes.

The early "ladder" set up on some of their PB4Y's even included handrails, although I am not certain how many of the airplanes had them. Later, the fleet was standardized with the seven rung set up without handrails.

Craig


Any specific reason for the external ladder? Just easier to get in/out, or was ther some type of internal change with the firebomber that precluded the use of the normal crew entry hatch? Always wondered/curious.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group