Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:07 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:19 am 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Viking Acquires DH Type Certificates

Wonder i they will build new beavers?

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:37 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
If they do build new Beavers, they'll be Turbo Beavers.

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:43 am 
Offline
Potato
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 3:21 am
Posts: 1068
Location: Out of the loop
Nice Beaver!

O.K. I couldn't resist the Leslie Nielsen reference.



What's the real big difference between a Beaver and a 195? Or in other words, whats the knock on 195's? The one person I've known who's flown both said he didn't like the vision/view in the 195.

I like both planes, but the Beaver cost's a heck of a lot more.

_________________
DEEP THOUGHTS BY KIDS:
"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started. Age 15 "


Deep Thoughts,
Jack Handy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: C-195
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:01 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
O.P. wrote:
Nice Beaver!

O.K. I couldn't resist the Leslie Nielsen reference.



What's the real big difference between a Beaver and a 195? Or in other words, whats the knock on 195's? The one person I've known who's flown both said he didn't like the vision/view in the 195.

I like both planes, but the Beaver cost's a heck of a lot more.


Hi OP! In a nutshell, the big difference is size, payload and don't forget
thirst. The 195 loaded is about where the Beaver begins empty. The Beav
is about 1/3 larger in everthing...like I say tho..this is nutshell.

For SEXY tho, the 195 wins. A 56year-old C-195 is sexier than the Beaver of the same vintage. :roll:

Sorry...nor could I resist. 8)

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Last edited by airnutz on Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
Grrr. Slack reporting.

de Havilland type responsibility lies with de Havilland Support Ltd. ( http://www.dhsupport.com/ ) de Havilland CANADA is what they are talking about, and the article makes clear from it's content, but DH and DHC are separate entities with different types built, excepting the Chipmunk.

DHC was a great company, with great aircraft designs. Pity DHA (Australia) never did as well.

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:02 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
O.P. wrote:
What's the real big difference between a Beaver and a 195? Or in other words, whats the knock on 195's?
Beaver has a lot more power and is a bigger airplane. Never flown a Beaver, but I did own and fly a 195. My guess is that the Beaver has much more docile landing characteristics too. Beaver has 450 HP while the 195 had a 300 HP Jacobs (or 350 with the turbo STC). Cessna 190 looks the same and has a 240 HP Continental by the way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 2:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
O.P. wrote:
What's the real big difference between a Beaver and a 195?

The Beaver is a utility aircraft, designed to do commercial jobs. The 195 is a general aviation aircraft. Work or fun! Because they both are good aircraft, their abilities extend into the other's territory, but that's what they were designed to do.

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C-195
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
airnutz wrote:
O.P. wrote:
What's the real big difference between a Beaver and a 195? Or in other words, whats the knock on 195's? The one person I've known who's flown both said he didn't like the vision/view in the 195.

I like both planes, but the Beaver cost's a heck of a lot more.


Hi OP! In a nutshell, the big difference is size, payload and don't forget
thirst. The 195 loaded is about where the Beaver begins empty. The Beav
is about 1/3 larger in everthing...like I say tho..this is nutshell.


When I said payload, I was using the generic term. The 195 was designed
to haul businessmen,hence 195 Businessaire. Dee Beaber was designed to
haul alot more..eh mes Ami's? The 195 happened to be the last taildragger
business machine. Most 195's were fitted with the 275hp Jacobs.

We have a 195 at La Porte corroding away that I would LOVE to mother
and TLC back to life. I had forgotten about the 3chute flare-dispenser on
the port side cabin-aft. Always loved those birds!

Here's a good online article for OP and all to peruse..it gives the plusses
and foibles of the 195. Be careful when looking to purchase one...lots of
ground-loop and ground-accidents due to the failure to meet the demands
of the reduced visibility from the cabin.
www.planeandpilotmag.com/content/2005/a ... na195.html

Edit... link wrong..fixed now.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C-195
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 12:50 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
airnutz wrote:
...lots of ground-loop and ground-accidents due to the failure to meet the demands of the reduced visibility from the cabin.
No, lots of ground-loop and ground-accidents from poor pilots failing to meet the demands of any taildragger aircraft or get the proper training. The plane is blind to the right (for the pilot) but very good to the left. You can even stick your head out of the roll-down window (probably not a good idea on landing though).

The plane is top heavy and has a lot of momentum, a situation that lots of taildraggers share. Mine had the heavy gear, I suspect that the light gear would worsen this situation. Never flew one with the crosswind gear, but some love it, others hate it. Never met someone who was in-between.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: C-195
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:15 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
bdk wrote:
airnutz wrote:
...lots of ground-loop and ground-accidents due to the failure to meet the demands of the reduced visibility from the cabin.
No, lots of ground-loop and ground-accidents from poor pilots failing to meet the demands of any taildragger aircraft or get the proper training. The plane is blind to the right (for the pilot) but very good to the left. You can even stick your head out of the roll-down window (probably not a good idea on landing though).

The plane is top heavy and has a lot of momentum, a situation that lots of taildraggers share. Mine had the heavy gear, I suspect that the light gear would worsen this situation. Never flew one with the crosswind gear, but some love it, others hate it. Never met someone who was in-between.


Thanks BDK for passing on your insight of experience!

Yeahh...I was afraid tat run-on sentence was going to come back and bite
me. That was the 2nd time that morning that I attempted to post comment
on the 195. The 2nd version which you read was a bit too condensed as I
was trying to beat, yet another "connection lost" boot off the net. Courtesy
of my local phone monopoly who assures me ....blah..blah..blah.. :roll:
I haven't had a clear line till now..maybe...

Anyway, what I originally said were comments culled from the P&P article
offered as lead-ins to the link. The article warned, if one was looking to
own a 195 to be careful..many were damaged in ground-loops and others
in ground accidents. Inspect carefully before you buy. Every machine has
it's limitations and needs..some folks fail to realize this and the machine
suffers. Caveat emptor...

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group