Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 1:47 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:45 am
Posts: 194
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
mrhenniger wrote:

Did it go down on it's climb out or did it crash after turning around for return to the airport?

Mike


Must have been after turning as it flew for 22 min. Take off 0620, crash 0642.

http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?Cont ... 68366dae9&


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 10:17 pm
Posts: 101
Location: Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Hi All,

Serial numbers of C-5s lost or written off as result of an accident:

s/n c/n (msn) date location
67-0172 500-0011 C-5A 5/25/70 Palmdale, California
66-8303 500-0001 C-5A 10/17/70 Marietta, Georgia
Unknown unk C-5A Sep71 Altus AFB, OK Engine mount fatigue failure
68-0227 500-0030 C-5A 9/27/74 Clinton, Oklahoma
68-0218 500-0021 C-5A 4/12/75 Near Saigon, South Vietnam
68-0228 500-0031 C-5A 8/29/90 Ramstein AFB, Germany
84-0059 500-83 C-5B 4/93/06 Dover AFB, Delaware


Cheers,

Amado


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:39 pm
Posts: 764
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Hi All,

if I can offer a bit of my own analysis on this. And Thank GOD that there was little loss of life and injury. If the pilot lost an engine while heavy, he must have had alot more problems than just loosing one engine. From the pic's I saw, it looked like he landed WAY heavy, and pancaked it on the ground, that broke the tail off, and then he snapped off the nose.

Just my two cents but the way that thing broke apart...I don't think you could have asked for better protection for the crew.

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
Aircraft Mech Paul wrote:
Hi All,

if I can offer a bit of my own analysis on this. And Thank GOD that there was little loss of life and injury. If the pilot lost an engine while heavy, he must have had alot more problems than just loosing one engine. From the pic's I saw, it looked like he landed WAY heavy, and pancaked it on the ground, that broke the tail off, and then he snapped off the nose.

Just my two cents but the way that thing broke apart...I don't think you could have asked for better protection for the crew.

Paul


That was the opinion offered by Paul Nantz, ABC's aviation specialist, when he saw the crash site and the skid marks in the ground, from the perspective of a helicopter fly over.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blurrkup, Google [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group