Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:12 am
Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:16 am
Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:26 am
lmritger wrote:Mercy Jeezus, Taigh, I cannot praise you enough for this insanely detailed walkthrough. I would dare say this may be the most complete documentation of any B-29 interior anywhere.
As an aside... when the fuselage was still stored at Silver Hill back in 1984, I sneaked away from our tour group, rolled under the fuselage and stood up in the unrestored forward bomb bay. What happened next I still can't fully explain; I was immediately hit with the most incredible feeling of sadness, bordering on despair, but I could tell it wasn't something I was personally feeling- it seemed to be something external to me. I'm sure that probably makes no sense, but there was most definitely a "presence" to being inside of the most powerful single weapon ever used by man, and it was not a feeling of awe or reverence. It was just overwhelming sadness.
That experience has stuck with me ever since.
Mark and I also have a pretty sizable album on the Enola Gay over on our CRAP Archive (Central Repository for Aviation Photos) at the following link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/133697406@N05/sets/72157668194515923/with/18625868085/. Here's a pic of the Enola Gay taken during the Crossroads tests in 1946:
Cheers, and thanks again to you Taigh and Mark for sharing your photos with us!
Lynn
Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:36 am
Badman wrote:lmritger wrote:Mercy Jeezus, Taigh, I cannot praise you enough for this insanely detailed walkthrough. I would dare say this may be the most complete documentation of any B-29 interior anywhere.
As an aside... when the fuselage was still stored at Silver Hill back in 1984, I sneaked away from our tour group, rolled under the fuselage and stood up in the unrestored forward bomb bay. What happened next I still can't fully explain; I was immediately hit with the most incredible feeling of sadness, bordering on despair, but I could tell it wasn't something I was personally feeling- it seemed to be something external to me. I'm sure that probably makes no sense, but there was most definitely a "presence" to being inside of the most powerful single weapon ever used by man, and it was not a feeling of awe or reverence. It was just overwhelming sadness.
That experience has stuck with me ever since.
Mark and I also have a pretty sizable album on the Enola Gay over on our CRAP Archive (Central Repository for Aviation Photos) at the following link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/133697406@N05/sets/72157668194515923/with/18625868085/. Here's a pic of the Enola Gay taken during the Crossroads tests in 1946:
Cheers, and thanks again to you Taigh and Mark for sharing your photos with us!
Lynn
Perhaps you or Mark (or anyone else) might be able to clarify something about Enola Gay for me - I've noticed a number of these photos appear to have been taken at Tinian and in some EG has the Circle R on the vertical tail and others it has the Circle Arrow. When and why was the tail marking changed and which marking was it wearing when it dropped the bomb?
Wed Aug 10, 2016 11:14 am
Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:23 am
sandiego89 wrote: I think I recall reading conflicting stories about picking the drop aircraft for Crossroads- that Enola gay had a technical issue, or some thought it already had made enough history?
Thank you again! Dave
Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:12 am
I wondered why they blanked off the scanners domes for Silverplate
Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:29 am
Old SAR pilot wrote:I wondered why they blanked off the scanners domes for Silverplate
They were blanked off to reduce any extreme flash effects produced by the nuclear explosion and protect the scanners, most likely.
Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:10 pm
Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:48 pm
Thu Aug 11, 2016 5:01 pm
wendovertom wrote:Old SAR pilot wrote:I wondered why they blanked off the scanners domes for Silverplate
They were blanked off to reduce any extreme flash effects produced by the nuclear explosion and protect the scanners, most likely.
My understanding from interviews - and my poor recollection - is that it was somewhat long the lines of - no guns, no need as well as the CFC station. Perhaps the nuclear flash was a thought too. The two B-29s that were supposed to fly aerial coverage for the Trinity test were "A" models so who knows - I'll dig out my copy of "They were called Silverplate" and see what it says about the scanner stations.
Tom P.
Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:52 pm
Silverplate wrote:From our touring General Tibbets during speaking appearances in Florida in the late 90's, I still have several signed copies of the Generals book available for $40 a copy plus shipping. Send me a PM if interested. Thanks...Mike
Fri Aug 12, 2016 10:00 pm
Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:10 pm
CoastieJohn wrote:Wow! A historic set of photo's. Mucho Gracias for posting those!!!!
General curiosity question that may have been addressed before. Is (or could it be) the EG in some sort of semi-airworthy condition?
AFWhite wrote:which marking was it wearing when it dropped the bomb?
sandiego89 wrote:Is the "blue box" on the radio operators table? Starboard side aft the flight engineers station?
Old SAR pilot wrote:They were blanked off to reduce any extreme flash effects produced by the nuclear explosion and protect the scanners, most likely.
APG85 wrote:From what I have read, the planes were stripped of almost all of their armament (except the tail gun) and the blisters. The reason for this was to make them slightly faster. At the altitudes they were flying and at that stage in the war, armament was something they thought they would not need. The flash had nothing to do with removing the blisters as they all wore welders googles during the drop...
lucky52 wrote:Taigh, what percentage of the interior is original (a guess would be fine).Thanks.
Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:55 pm