Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:14 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 2:07 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
While doing a Google search on something else, a photo of a H-19 being loaded into a transport aircraft came up. I wasn't too shocked since lots of H-19s were transported that way "back in the day". But I noticed it was being loaded in a C-17....

It seems Kirtland is getting rid of many of its statics. I believe it was home to PJ training and it had a very complete collection of ARS aircraft when I last visited the base in the 90s. Had a number of helicopters plus an Albatross and a OA-10 (PBY).
I noticed that the H-21 has gone to Little Rock, now the H-19 went to McChord.

http://www.mcchordairmuseum.org/REV%20B ... 0CHORD.htm

Anyone know where other Kirtland ac are going, or if they're getting scrapped?
Their disbursement seems to have been under our (and Air Classics) radar.

You'd think the NMUSAF would put out a news release to counteract some if the bad press it has gotten regarding other scrapping (Chanute, Edwards, etc.), but I'd wager a buck that the museum or its PR staff don't know they've gotten any bad press.
From my experiences with their public affairs staff, I don't think they follow the enthusiast media.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Last edited by JohnB on Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:12 am
Posts: 924
Location: Just outside of Grosse Ile N.A.S.
Good news!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:04 am
Posts: 212
Interesting.............


I'll try to stop by KAFB tomorrow and see what is left. I wouldn't be surprised if they bulldozed the rest. I know many years ago they were entertaining bids to do preventative maintenance on them, but i don't think they ever actually let out a contract.

The OA-10 was the most stripped display airframe I'd ever seen, but the helicopters were in much better shape. I'll bet the C-47 gets scrapped.

Gee, with the National Museum of Nuclear Science & History right next door, you'd think they'd just donate them so the museum could have some trading stock.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
I'm sure Sid will chime in to let us know if this aircraft is indeed H-19B, 52-7540. I have an image of it in flight and it was indeed built with a straight tail while others around it were being constructed with the 3 degree sloping tail. According to Sid's database, it was built as Sikorsky Construction Number 55643 and delivered on March 2, 1954.

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:49 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
I thought all Bs had the sloped tail? I see from my serial list it was built in the second batch of Bs...and the first with FY52 serials. Perhaps the sloped tail was added later?

I wonder if they ever flew them interchangeably...or if they put B tails on As after overhaul?
It doesn't seem to matter at the NMUSAF...for 30 years they've had a B impersonating an A. :)

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
John,

I likely have others but, here are views of two H-19Bs, 51-3918 and 52-7511(see next post), wearing both straight and sloping tail booms. The sloping tails were designed to alleviate the issue with S-55 variants chopping off their own tails and were interchangeable as a fix for existing aircraft as well.


Attachments:
51-3918.jpg
51-3918.jpg [ 352.67 KiB | Viewed 1858 times ]
51-3918.jpg
51-3918.jpg [ 81.04 KiB | Viewed 1858 times ]

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
52-7511


Attachments:
52-7511.jpg
52-7511.jpg [ 76.49 KiB | Viewed 1851 times ]
52-7511.1.jpg
52-7511.1.jpg [ 32.37 KiB | Viewed 1851 times ]

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:58 am
Posts: 443
Location: Lincoln, England
It's a UH-19F, serial 138499.
Andy Marden

USAMOOS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:20 pm
Posts: 139
Location: Thirsk, N.Yorks, England
It was originally painted as 51-3893, to represent "Hop-a-Long", which took part in the first crossing of the Atlantic by helicopter, in 1952. The Air Force in its wisdom, sold this historical helicopter to the Spanish Air Force in 1962 and was lost in service with them, 11 June 1964.

The helicopter itself was as Andy has said, 138499, which was SOC by the Navy 30 October 1964. I shot it at Kirtland in 1989.

Image

Here is the real Hop A Long

Image

I have no idea why the Kirtland example was repainted as 52-7540, but that helicopter was supplied to the Ecuador Air Force in 1966.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
Thank you, Sid!

Knowing now that is was an HO4S explains the two-piece windscreen and the eyebrow windows.

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:44 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
Next spring, I'll try to get photos...it will be a good excuse to see their C-124 too.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], phil65 and 240 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group