Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:50 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:43 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:19 pm
TAdan wrote:That's just bizarre! So...The person who made the request is selling the very item the signer requested they don't sell?![]()
I enjoy collecting signatures on photos and artwork. I've even bought a few signed pieces second hand but I'd always prefer to get the signatures in person. It means a lot to me to be able to meet the person, have a conversation and make a memory. Certainly not interested in selling them for a profit.
Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:18 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:56 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:39 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:57 pm
Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:31 pm
StangStung wrote:I have lots of autographs. I obtained them all for me, and hopefully one day, my son will appreciate them.
That said, I have a not insignificant number which I have purchased second hand. I've found them randomly in books at airshows, second hand stores and estate sales. I've never bought one on e-bay. But the point is, the "Ashley" in this letter very well may not be the person selling this photo/letter combo. It's equally possible that Ashley was respectful of this vet's wishes. It's those "downstream" who may not know or care of the significance. They may just see a source of cash.
I have mixed feelings about that. On the one hand, I'd like to see the wishes adhered to. But they may no longer apply if the vet giving the signature, or the recipient of the signature, are no longer around. It may be just as well that someone pays for it and keeps it in the regard which we would ascribe to it, than have it go to a landfill because it shouldn't be sold.
Hard to tell from the scant info we have here.
Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:01 am
Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:50 am
Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:02 am
Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:53 pm
Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:18 pm
That was exactly what I was thinking when I read the original post here.Ken wrote:Benefit of the doubt, maybe the person who obtained the signature has now passed on as well and his/her stuff is being liquidated ...
Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:34 pm