Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:48 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
For you students of WWII aircraft history, you may like this Senate report from July of 1943. It talks about the different aircraft and their uses. It goes into detail about the investigation into the problems (substandard engines, cover-ups, etc) at the Curtiss-Wright plant in Lockland, OH. The engine may have been the R-2600? It also talks about early helo development and rips the Navy apart for intentionally failing to explore helicopter use.

http://www.aviation-history.com/engines/Truman_Committee_SRes71.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
If someone could write a book about WWII aircraft procurement problems without having a political axe to grind (unlike the biased "Barons of the Sky"), it would be well worth reading for those who think all of WWII was "Rosie the Rivetter" and war bonds/PR stuff.

I'd like to too earn more favourite fall of CW and how Martin fell from grace with the USAAC/USAAF/USAF.

The commentator the Navy and helicopters is interesting, since later on the war the Navy sponsored a fair bit of helicopter research, primarily for possible ASW applications (which wouldn't become practical until the capable HSS-1 (H-34/S-58) became available.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:17 pm
Posts: 27
Location: undercover
Second JohnB...

Barons of the Sky was decidedly antiwar (you guess who that might be) perspective.

The Truman reports tell you just what the left was up to during the war, and they are not ashamed of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
This may help explain the environment during the WWII time frame with govt/defense contractors. My reading of this leads me to believe it was a three-fold purpose. One of course was rooting out the fraud, waste and abuse in govt contracts during the war. The others were political in nature dealing with protecting FDR's lack of oversight and excessive spending and greasing the skids for Truman as the next President. I Googled around for Martin aircraft issues involved with the Truman Committee. I seen the frequent B-26 crashes mentioned a few times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truman_Committee

I read this about the R-2600's built at that Curtiss-Wright plant. That is where I got the idea this was the engine the subcommittee report was talking about. Someone else may know more about this and if any other aircraft engine types were involved??

http://www.enginehistory.org/Wright/R-2600/R-2600Lockland.shtml

Yes, the Navy's decision not to embrace helo's early on was surprising. I knew the AAF and USCG were deeply interested in the use of helos....the CG more for SAR than ASW and I believe the AAF for field medivacs of the wounded.

We were having an offline discussion about the CG's three Curtiss SOC-4's (V171, V172, V173). One of our CG aircraft historians mentioned he located in his research that after the Truman Committee's work, future VP and Prez Truman made sure Curtiss did not get anymore govt aircraft contracts, which was their demise for aircraft production. He also mentioned the govt/AAF told them to start producing P-51's and they refused and kept producing the P-40. There may be more to the story but that was what he was recalling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
At the end of the report it said they were investigating aircraft accidents and will submit another report
Does any know where the follow on report is?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
At the end of the report it said they were investigating aircraft accidents and will submit another report
Does any know where the follow on report is?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
At the end of the report it said they were investigating aircraft accidents and will submit another report
Does any know where the follow on report is?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
At the end of the report it said they were investigating aircraft accidents and will submit another report
Does any know where the follow on report is?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
At the end of the report it said they were investigating aircraft accidents and will submit another report
Does any know where the follow on report is?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:36 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
I think six is a record!

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
CoastieJohn wrote:
One of our CG aircraft historians mentioned he located in his research that after the Truman Committee's work, future VP and Prez Truman made sure Curtiss did not get anymore govt aircraft contracts, which was their demise for aircraft production.



That doesn't account for them being one of the finalists for the Interceptor program with their F-87...or getting a contract to build the X-19.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 pm
Posts: 1380
JohnB wrote:
CoastieJohn wrote:
One of our CG aircraft historians mentioned he located in his research that after the Truman Committee's work, future VP and Prez Truman made sure Curtiss did not get anymore govt aircraft contracts, which was their demise for aircraft production.



That doesn't account for them being one of the finalists for the Interceptor program with their F-87...or getting a contract to build the X-19.



Looking around, I see they didn't get the F-87 contract which forced them to sell off their aviation division to NA. The X-19 was post-Truman.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:05 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
My point was they beat other contractors to build the XP-87....they got paid to design and build it.
And not generally known is in June, 1948 (which was during the Truman administration) they received a production contract for 57 production fighters and 30 RF-87As. Lockheed was offering a F-90 variant, and Douglas was offering a AF specific F3D. So they did beat out a couple of big name competitors.
After more tests, the Air Force decided the F-89 had more potential and cancelled the Blackhawk.
The very fact they received a development and prototype contracts, then one for a healthy production quantity, indicates they had sone goodwill somewhere.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group