Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
JohnTerrell wrote:
...Collings also now have the Spitfire Mk.XVI TE356 (ex-Evergreen Museum) which of course will need a good deal of work to fly again.


Do we know where TE356 is currently located?

PeterA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 4:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2339
Location: Minnesota
BenG wrote:
John, the Collings Foundation one is a Mk.IX and not a Mk.V.

Ben


Sorry, Ben, I should have gotten that typed correctly (I guess I was just thinking about its early features).

Peter, TE356 still remains at the Evergreen Museum in McMinnville, Oregon, for the time being (at least as of a month ago, it was pictured still there).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 7:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 1672
Fleet16b wrote:
PeterA wrote:
Dave Hadfield wrote:
We have 2 of course: a flying Mk XVI and a Mk IX that will fly this summer.

http://www.vintagewings.ca/en-ca/home.aspx


Dave,

My understanding is that SL721, your 'flying Mk XVI', requires quite a lot of TLC to get it back in the air.

PeterA


That was my understanding as well and that the aircraft is currently for sale


No, not at all. We stole the prop off the XVI and put it on the IX for the first engine runs last summer. And we are having another prop built up out of our extra parts -- should be ready in the spring. And the XVI has most of it's panels and plates and fairings removed -- but that's no big deal.

The XVI is REALLY handy during the restoration of the IX. They are parked side-by-side. The guys can instantly see what-was-what on the XVI, and transfer that to the IX. Right now the IX is having the cowlings and wing-root fairings built. This is very time-consuming of course, because much of it is endless fitting and English-wheel work, but the result appears to be superb.

Ken W., the man doing the work, is an artist.

Anyway, we'll market the XVI once the IX is flying (after this summer) because we don't need 2. But it will be sold as a flying aircraft.

Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:09 pm
Posts: 481
Location: Michigan City, Indiana
Sm 969, which was Beasley's ,I was at the Reading WW2 weekend a few years ago and it was there , or I think it was his, and it took off after a P51 finished its routine. The difference in sound between the Griffon and Merlin was obvious. The Griffon Spit really outshined the Merlin Mustang. I know it wasn't a winner take all show but the Spit was impressive. 149 + thousand Merlins built and 8+ thousand Griffons built per WIKI.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 280
Location: Perth Western Australia
Can anyone update on the situation with repairs to Bill Greenwood's Mk TIX TE308 / N308WK?

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1352
Location: Galveston County
Yes, I have been wondering about the status of both the Greenwood, and LSFM, Spits. Anyone?

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 1:09 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:48 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: West Valley, Silicon Valley
TE 384

51 Factory
Image

_________________
remember the Oogahonk!
old school enthusiast of Civiltary Warbirds and Air Racers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 113
Location: Sydney
TBM Tony wrote:
geek Sorry, But did I missed the Lone Star Flight Museum's Mk. XVI ( Converted to High Back, :cry: ) that was caught in the Hurricane's High water ? again, so sorry if I missed that here! :?


This is interesting. From the basic search I have just done, TE392 was a gate guardian basically it's whole life until 1984 when it was recovered. It would seem the conversion to high-back was carried out in United States in the late nineties? I would have thought that the airframe would have been largely intact & original until it's restoration to flight, so why would it have been converted to high-back?

Was it just because high-back Spitfires look more like Spitfires..... so to speak?

And when that "restoration" was carried out on what I am presuming was an original British airframe.... how much American sheetmetal, hardware, rivets & fittings were incorporated?

Was this the done thing back in the day & if so, were any other Spitfires "converted"?

Just interested to know if anyone can shed any light on it?

Jason


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
Being based at KESN, (Easton, MD). I can confirm Mr Blair's Spitfires are kept airworthy.

Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Jason wrote:
TBM Tony wrote:
geek Sorry, But did I missed the Lone Star Flight Museum's Mk. XVI ( Converted to High Back, :cry: ) that was caught in the Hurricane's High water ? again, so sorry if I missed that here! :?


This is interesting. From the basic search I have just done, TE392 was a gate guardian basically it's whole life until 1984 when it was recovered. It would seem the conversion to high-back was carried out in United States in the late nineties? I would have thought that the airframe would have been largely intact & original until it's restoration to flight, so why would it have been converted to high-back?

Was it just because high-back Spitfires look more like Spitfires..... so to speak?

And when that "restoration" was carried out on what I am presuming was an original British airframe.... how much American sheetmetal, hardware, rivets & fittings were incorporated?

Was this the done thing back in the day & if so, were any other Spitfires "converted"?

Just interested to know if anyone can shed any light on it?

Jason

I DO Know it was restored in Florida, before LSFM received it !

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
Jason wrote:
This is interesting. From the basic search I have just done, TE392 was a gate guardian basically it's whole life until 1984 when it was recovered. It would seem the conversion to high-back was carried out in United States in the late nineties? I would have thought that the airframe would have been largely intact & original until it's restoration to flight, so why would it have been converted to high-back?

Jason


The high back conversion was undertaken in the UK during 1989.

Image

"...Following Doug Arnold’s death in 1992, TE392 together with BR601 was shipped to the USA and placed in store. In March 1994 it was reported as sold to Mike Araldi on behalf of Jet Cap Aviation and shipped to Harry Stenger’s facility at Bartow, Florida, where the restoration work continued to airworthy condition."


PeterA


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group