Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 2:12 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:45 am
Posts: 194
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
In my first shot of the diving 109 you can clearly see the automatic slats activated. This is/was a clever design. Did any other WW2 fighter have a similar design?

Who is the registered owner of this particular 109 and what is the reg and c/n?

Thanks

Nicolai


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
The pilot did an excellent job displaying the aircraft. I would imagine it's not the easiest or best designed jet he has ever flown. It looks like he is still getting used to the bird and is making adjustments. On the takeoff roll he waggled the rudder pedals as though it was an old habit from making sure the tailwheel is locked on a taildragger. He pumped the stick a little on takeoff while trying to find a correct nose up attitude and that makes me think the airplane may be very pitch sensitive.
Interesting , it's sink rate on short final. Wouldn't want to get behind the power curve! Also noted was the way the 262 touched down and seemed to veer to the right a little. Almost like when a wheel touches, the wing quits flying quickly, or maybe all that weight way out there on the wing causes it to pitch right. Did he hit the brakes too hard?
Of course it has a weak nose gear but he appears to be holding the nose off for a little more aerodynamic braking. Not much in the way of flaps on the 262. Excellent video and that guy did an exceptional job with the "Stormbird."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
In my first shot of the diving 109 you can clearly see the automatic slats activated. This is/was a clever design. Did any other WW2 fighter have a similar design?

Bf 110, Me 210, Me 410, Me 262 all had leading edge slats.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:14 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
MiG-3, La-5 and La-7 had them.

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 11:57 pm
Posts: 223
Location: Planet Earth
Dan K wrote:
In my first shot of the diving 109 you can clearly see the automatic slats activated. This is/was a clever design. Did any other WW2 fighter have a similar design? Me 210...

...Got them back as it was a disaster without. It kind of then became the 410 with a stretch...

The Westland Lysander was unique in history in having flaps operated entirely by the airflow through the automatic l/e inner slats. When speed decayed, the inner slats opened, and they put down the flaps. The pilot has no manual control for either. (It also has automatic outer slats, as per the question.)

Messeschmitt started the automatic slat preference with the high-speed touring aircraft the Bf-108, also in the 1930s.

The Tiger Moth also has automatic slats, normally locked shut nowadays in many cases.

The Supermarine Seagull V, the Australian version of the Supermarine Walrus also had automatic slats fitted.

_________________
Raven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:22 am
Posts: 422
Location: Melbourne
Great pics and fantastic footage, thanks for posting them up, can't get enough of the 262 :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Ed Heineman used the German delta technology for the A-4 aircraft. I'm sure the 262 data prompted him to use automatic slats to slow the A-4 down for carrier use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:01 am
Posts: 7
Shay wrote:
STEARMAN wrote:
I believe that the '262 had a weak nose gear design. Keeping the weight off would be a good thing, as well as aiding in aerodynamic breaking.

Greg


My understanding is that this issue was addressed by identifying the faulty components and engineering better ones for the replicas. Maybe he just came in nose high. The aircraft has only been in counrty a matter of months. I imagine 262 time for the pilot(s) is still relatively low. Anyone know who is flying it anyways. The was a german pilot who was flying it out in Washington but I believe he lives here in the US.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis



You are right,an extra 100lbs were added to the nose area to strengthen it,and the area where the main gear attaches to the wong was strengthened to ( it seems that when the design was changed from taildragger to tricycle they didn't make is as strong as it should have been,and would have led to cracks in the attachment area eventually).

There is also a video on Google of the 262 at Berlin,although the camera work isn't to good!(they spend most of the time showing the hosts and a Mig 29) :

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4330343657

size is 59 mb ( WMP wouldn't play it,so I used the DIVX player).


James


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:42 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Found a section of a the video that James mentioned (i think) that just invloves the Me 262, I blogged it on Warbirds-Online.org but there is a link to it there. (and yes it is a shameless plug to try and get you guys to check out our latest endeavor!)

http://www.warbirds-online.org/?p=26

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Last edited by Scott Rose on Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:04 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
systemofadown1162 wrote:
TimApNy wrote:
I think one needs to show up to Thunder over Michigan. We really need Axis presences for the show. How many times can we watch a single 109 get shot down?

Hmmm I guess I could watch that all day, but throw in a 262 and how about a new built 190 :shock: That would be a sight!

I love the fact that the shots are good quality. It’s about time some of those come out. I assume it flew dirty for the first flight?

Tim

What is flying dirty?


Flying with the gear down.

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
The Stinson L-1 also had automatic leading edge slats. Made a pretty loud bang when they opened.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:26 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
Well that just depends.... :oops:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flying+Dirty

In this case pick definiton #2
Gear and Flaps and all hanging out in the wind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:35 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
a26invader wrote:
In my first shot of the diving 109 you can clearly see the automatic slats activated. This is/was a clever design. Did any other WW2 fighter have a similar design?
Those are commonly known as Handley Page leading edge slats after the company that developed them. Seems that the Germans took a liking to them more than did the country where they were developed!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:49 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Wily Messerschmitt traded with the engineers at Handley Page his invention of the single spar wing for their information on the aerodynamically operated leading edge slats designed by Handley Page. This was first seen on the Bf-108 Taifun . The 108 also has a single spar wing. I believe the Messerchmitt Bf-108 first flew in 1935. The 109 came later and it also has both of the inventions.
As far as the A-4 Skyhawk, they are definitely similar. Both operate independent of the pilot and have to do with airspeed and proximity to a stall. Yes they will deploy in an accelerated stall. Ed Heinemann was such a prolific engineer you have to assume he was very much aware of and educated in everyone's ideas as well as his own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:35 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
As the center of pressure on the airfoil moves forward with increasing angle of attack, the slats get sucked out. Not always symmetrically though in practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 75 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group