Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 5:51 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7822
In 1943, a USAAF PQ-12A target drone was equipped with a 500 lb. warhead and flown into a PQ-8 target drone via radio commands from an accompanying UC-98 Bobcat utility aircraft.
Below is a photo of a PQ-12A drone/missile.

Image

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
:| :|

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:03 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
I've never seen those. They look like Ercoupes on acid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
A crude "bomber destroyer"?

If course the idea missed the point that bombers of the period had fairly good defending armament. If attacking fighters had a tough time getting through a formation, I'm not sure a remotely piloted low performance drone would have much of a chance.

Of course, this could have been a simple proof of concept experiment, it certainly would have worked better with war weary fighters (imagine something like the F6F-5K drones used in Korea).

Of course that overlooked the fact that late in the war, we were the only nation putting up large daylight bomber formations.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Last edited by JohnB on Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
Weren't the Germans already lobbing rockets into our bomber formations from 109s, 110s, and 190s by 1943? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 11:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Hmm. OK, maybe first air-to-air guided missile?

Cool image, Mark! 41-39049 checks out as a Fleetwings YPQ-12A-FL, one of a batch of eight.

Should UC-98 be UC-78?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Snake45 wrote:
Weren't the Germans already lobbing rockets into our bomber formations from 109s, 110s, and 190s by 1943? :?


And developing (or proposed at least) A2A versions of the Schmetterling and Rhinetochter

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 9:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
First Air to Air Missile was fielded by the French...many years before all these...

Used against airborne balloons, a tough to destroy flying target in 1915!


Attachments:
EC8B7B10-6CF9-439B-8B09-9F572F10D768.jpeg

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:27 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1943
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Chris Brame wrote:
Hmm. OK, maybe first air-to-air guided missile?

Joe Scheil wrote:
First Air to Air Missile was fielded by the French...many years before all these...

Just wanted to point out that "guided missile" is redundant and that the weapons the French used in World War I are rockets:

Missile = Guided
Rocket = Unguided

Also, since it is relevant, I just want to plug my Aircraft Design Firsts thread.

From Wikipedia:
Wikipedia wrote:
The first flight test [of the Ruhrstahl X-4] occurred on August 11, 1939 using a Focke-Wulf Fw 190 for the launch platform. Subsequent tests used the Junkers Ju 88 and Messerschmitt Me 262, although they were not launched from the latter.

From the National Air and Space Museum:
[The Ruhrstahl X-4] was slated for use with the Me 262 jet fighter, but could also have been fired from a number of piston-engine aircraft such as the Ju 88, Ju 388 and Fw 190, all of which launched test missiles beginning in August 1944.

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 10:43 pm
Posts: 1
Noha307 wrote:
Chris Brame wrote:
Hmm. OK, maybe first air-to-air guided missile?

Joe Scheil wrote:
First Air to Air Missile was fielded by the French...many years before all these...

Just wanted to point out that "guided missile" is redundant and that the weapons the French used in World War I are rockets:

Missile = Guided
Rocket = Unguided

Also, since it is relevant, I just want to plug my Aircraft Design Firsts thread.

From Wikipedia:
Wikipedia wrote:
The first flight test [of the Ruhrstahl X-4] occurred on August 11, 1939 using a Focke-Wulf Fw 190 for the launch platform. Subsequent tests used the Junkers Ju 88 and Messerschmitt Me 262, although they were not launched from the latter.

From the National Air and Space Museum:
[The Ruhrstahl X-4] was slated for use with the Me 262 jet fighter, but could also have been fired from a number of piston-engine aircraft such as the Ju 88, Ju 388 and Fw 190, all of which launched test missiles beginning in August 1944.


AAM "FC(Fighter Control) Spaniel"
Tested in 1942.
All errors taken into account, the chance of causing (A) damage is 0.665.
All the information can be obtained from TNA document AVIA 41/55.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:28 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7822
Photo restored

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:57 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1943
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
gundam456dx wrote:
AAM "FC(Fighter Control) Spaniel"
Tested in 1942.
All errors taken into account, the chance of causing (A) damage is 0.665.
All the information can be obtained from TNA document AVIA 41/55.

Very interesting, never heard of that before, thanks. Found a bit more information in a Secret Projects thread (that I see you were involved in).

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group