Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 7:25 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 5:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
We all know--and I have even heard it, having been about 20 during the airplane's heyday--that the B-36 had an unusual sound when flying overhead, even high overhead. A low, chest-pulsing drone. What created it? Was it the pusher props working in the wake of the wing? Certainly it wasn't the exhaust sound, since there were plenty of R-4360-powered airplanes that didn't sound anything like the B-36. One explanation that I have heard, from a former B-36 crewman, was that it was caused by "the low-frequency hum of the prop tips."

Anybody care to theorize? (I'm preparing a B-36 article for Aviation History Magazine.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 5:26 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
An obvious guess from a non-engineer...
Propwash hitting the fuselage.

To me, many pushers have a unique sound: Cessna Skymasters, Lakes, and Avantis come to mind.
I don't have enough experience with Long EZs or Starships to give an opinion on them...but the may sound different still because their props are aft of the fuselage.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:05 am
Posts: 397
Im pretty sure its the way the exhaust is piped through the propeller. It throws the sound around in a different way.

I would love to see a computer model that better shows how/why this happens. It would make a good thesis for someone in an engineering course.

Sean


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 7:02 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 2051
Location: Creemore Ontario Canada
A lot of pushers have unique sounds and I think a big part of it is the exhaust being cut by the prop blades as it passes through.
Listen to a turboprop like a DASH-8 start. Although not a pusher. the inlet air gets cut by the prop as it enters the inlet. The sound changes as the speed increases.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDdOGqSMK7M
Listen to a Piaggio Avanti. They have a "buzz" that is for sure caused by the exhaust stream being cut by the prop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhuZ-YoityQ

Skip to 1:50


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 7:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
The prop blades are in dirty air. On each rotation, each blade passes the trailing edge of the wing twice - once going down, once going up. Multiply by 18 blades and you get a characteristic sound. Passing through the exhaust may have some effect too.

Go to your local EAA fly-in and listen to the canard types as they come and go. They have a unique sound too because of the same factors, but instead of 20,000 hp and 18 blades, their noise is from 200 horsepower and 3 blades.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 10:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1596
The Tu-95 and An-22 sound similar: must be prop rather than engine-related.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2020 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
Stephan,

Perhaps either this 1952 NACA study or the 1990 NASA study will offer some insight.

https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a377112.pdf

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi ... 012515.pdf

_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:18 pm
Posts: 154
The B-36 unique sound was the way the props were heated - the propellers were hollow allowing heated air to pass from the shaft and vented out the tips.

Pusher aircraft also have a unique noise, I can identify a Piaggio P.180 by it's unique sound.

https://youtu.be/QS9ZwqjyonY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 1:44 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1596
wolf wrote:
The B-36 unique sound was the way the props were heated - the propellers were hollow allowing heated air to pass from the shaft and vented out the tips.

Pusher aircraft also have a unique noise, I can identify a Piaggio P.180 by it's unique sound.

https://youtu.be/QS9ZwqjyonY


Not a unique sound though: lots of props more to do with it I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 6:43 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1199
In speaking to several C-133 crew I think it has more to do with the propeller. The C-133 had a similar propeller to the B-36, also a Curtis type, and was also known for a similar, distinctive drone and high vibration. The forces and speed of this propeller were really pushing the limits of blade limits with massive power, torque and speeds. Even with reduction gear the blades tips were travelling very fast and moving a tremendous amount of air.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 11:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Thank you for all your theories. I do agree that the sound probably was created by the props, not the exhausts, since typically any prop-driven airplanes propeller[s] produce far more noise than the exhaust[s].


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 915
Location: ELP
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
Thank you for all your theories. I do agree that the sound probably was created by the props, not the exhausts, since typically any prop-driven airplanes propeller[s] produce far more noise than the exhaust[s].


It quite possibly is due to the exhaust flow out of the nacelles and through the prop discs, or maybe better stated as the exhaust being ejected into the prop disc. In any case it is a unique sound.

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:11 pm
Posts: 64
Location: Vancouver, BC
Blow into a turning fan, I would hazard it is exhaust hitting turning prop.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group