Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:07 pm
Robbo wrote:Congratulations, Trevor.
You've laid out the case very professionally and convincingly.
I'll second that. Well thought out. Thanks for taking the time.
Mike
Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:51 pm
And I'll third it.
You all have to remember that the mention of a B-32 was in a thread about a time warped bomber found in greenland......
I have to commend Trevor for his research on this, heck, I wouldn't have taken the time as I considered the thread pure campfire 'drinkin too much with my buds' nonsense to begin with.
Me, I'm tryin to figure out how to get to greenland to look at the reporter...
( at least THAT one has a chance of existing )
Luck, Frank
You all have to remember that the mention of a B-32 was in a thread about a time warped bomber found in greenland......
I have to commend Trevor for his research on this, heck, I wouldn't have taken the time as I considered the thread pure campfire 'drinkin too much with my buds' nonsense to begin with.
Me, I'm tryin to figure out how to get to greenland to look at the reporter...
( at least THAT one has a chance of existing )
Luck, Frank
Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:09 pm
For B-32 read P-61?
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... php?p=7442
Or has anyone actually seen the photos?
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... php?p=7442
Or has anyone actually seen the photos?
Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:16 pm
Rumors do hurt and cause otherwise stable organizations to have problems/hard feelings. Ask a MAPS member.
Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:42 pm
Mike wrote:For B-32 read P-61?
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... php?p=7442
Or has anyone actually seen the photos?
Heh, heh, heh, heh. Very nice Mike!
Yeah RER, whatever became of the photos on the CD?
regards,
t~
Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:57 pm
I do not resile from this - I said there is an aircraft there which think is or could be a B32 and I believe that - I certainly hope so- If I am wrong then so be it - I can't prove it and I have no proof other than the thin evidence I stated - it was never well researched but I hope/hoped this is /was the case
John Parker
John Parker
Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:38 am
Learned a new word there! 
Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:53 am
setter wrote:I do not resile from this - I said there is an aircraft there which think is or could be a B32 and I believe that - I certainly hope so- If I am wrong then so be it - I can't prove it and I have no proof other than the thin evidence I stated - it was never well researched but I hope/hoped this is /was the case
John Parker
Ready to defend the indefensible????
How are those SE Asia recoveries doing???
Syrian Spitfires???
Lewis Gun???
P-61???
P-38's????
Why don't you give us an update???
Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:09 am
setter wrote:I do not resile from this - I said there is an aircraft there which think is or could be a B32 and I believe that - I certainly hope so- If I am wrong then so be it - I can't prove it and I have no proof other than the thin evidence I stated - it was never well researched but I hope/hoped this is /was the case
John Parker
John, I'd urge you to read this thread again in its entirity (not just the bits that are palatable to you). I think you'll see that the realisation has now dawned that the only "thin evidence" has been supplied by you and your sidekick and none of it has checked out. It's not the first time.
Rob
Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:01 am
setter wrote:I do not resile from this - I said there is an aircraft there which think is or could be a B32 and I believe that - I certainly hope so- If I am wrong then so be it - I can't prove it and I have no proof other than the thin evidence I stated - it was never well researched but I hope/hoped this is /was the case
John Parker
Thin? I can see right through it.!
regards,
t~