Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 9:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ASJA/SAAB Sk 14
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
Image
Image
Image

Considering the obvious number of NA-16 aficionados on this forum, I am sure there wil be a certain amount of interest in this little lady, a BT-9 built under licence in Sweden. Predecessors of the retractable series, these 137 aircraft served for 2 decades before standing aside for the arrival of the Sk 16, aka Harvard Mk IIB (or AT-16 in americanese).

It took 20 years for this unique example to come to life, but taking your time works for the better in the long run. She's a beauty - but then I'm prejudiced (just ask Steve or Tulio! :D )

The photo is from the display in the Flygvapenmuseum (Swedish Air Force Museum) and shows the team which finally got the job done (although many, many hard-working souls played their part along the way - including some who, unfortunately, did not live to see her rolled out. (An interesting bit of data - in Swedish, she was rolled in!)

The construction team was made up of museum employees and members of the Swedish Aviation Historical Society and they deserve a round of applause for a job well done.

Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Nice aircraft indeed, and very rare, to be sure. Thanks for posting the photos. When was she completed, and how original is the airframe? (ie. how much of it is really Harvard and Yale?).

Cheers. Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 1081
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Richard--

Going on memory, but I think I'm fairly close...this sole extant representative "BT-9" is a kind of exercise in the interchangeability of parts designed into the NA-16 series. In this case, the engine and centre section/main gear are Yale; the fuselage and tail are CAC Wirraway. I forget which type the outer wings are from.

So...we've got an American-designed, Swedish-built trainer represented by an airframe comprised mainly of parts from airframes either built in the USA for France but operated in Canada, or built and operated in Australia! Fine testament to the broad usage and influence of NAA's classic trainer...and a magnificent museum piece.

S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 4:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
G'day Doug,

So you've finally joined this site mate. Great to have you around on here. I have to apologise for not being in touch lately. You know what my movements are like though. Shall try to get an e-mail through to you in the near future.

Cheers,
Matt (of the Australian - Wirraway addicted - variety)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
This aircraft was, as Steve has already pointed out, an exercise in the interchangeability of parts of the early variants of the NA-16 family. Built up of leftover bits of a real Sk 14, a Yale and a Wirraway, the reproduction is comletely accurate.

In fact, before any real work was done, a complete set of working drawings was discovered in Japan (one of the other 3 countries to receive demonstrator aircraft and potential licence agreements.)

Completion of the aircraft took place in the sumer of '03, just days before the printers released our book. Is she real? She is absolutely identical to the examples that flew with the Flygvapnet, so, you decide.

Doug 8)

oops! Forgot! :oops: Hi Steve! G'day, Matt!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Thanks Steve and Doug for the explanations. A very interesting exercise indeed, and great to see a representation of an important sub-variant. I do love the more obscure aircraft from this era.

Cheers,
Richard

PS. Do you know what actual parts from an Sk.14 were used? I assume that they were not substantial, but it's always interesting to hear of an aircraft's pedigree.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group