Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 7:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: B25 mitchell question
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:40 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
Hello Guys
B25s are as foreign to me as they get but I do like reading about them etc etc. I was wondering why some B25s have many small fairings on the cowlings and some dont?

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
the small fairing cover exhaust stacks. on the wartime models, all the cylinders had individual stacks, hence fairings all the way around the cowls. After the war, B-25s that were kept in service underwent overhaul and came out with a combination of individual stacks and half collector ring.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: B-25 mitchell question
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:59 pm
Posts: 841
Location: Redmond,Oregon
From what I've read about B-25's,the individual short stacks were the only arrangement that worked for flame dampening for night flying.The A-26 used flattened finger stacks for the same purpose,but they were on R2800's and apparently didn't work on the R2600's used on B-25's

The main problem with short stacks is that they are very loud.with no muffling qualities at all.Another problem is that the exhaust nuts loosen up from vibration.We had a similar problem on High Gross Beech 18's which had an extractor exhaust system that used various lengths of relatively short stacks.

The #7 stack (I think it was) ended up as a single short stack.I've had a few of those either rattle the exhaust nuts loose,or break at the flange weld and fall off in flight.You can tell when you taxi in by the popping noise from the open exhaust port.I wondered where the stacks ended up.Think "The Gods Must Be Crazy".

Super PBY's and PB4Y's that were used as air tankers were modified to use surplus B-25 QEC's.These had partial collector rings along with some remaining short stacks.From what I understand,post-war B-25's had the partial collectors installed for muffling properties,as the short stacks closest to the fuselage caused fatigue on both the airframe and aircrew.

The Super PBY's used to "Hot Load",or fill with retardant with the engines running,as they were mounted so high as to not cause a safety problem to the loaders.After two or three minutes at idle,the combination of a rich mixture and short,very hot exhaust stacks made it sound like a fire-fight was taking place.Also,the co-pilot usually carried a sawed-off broom handle during post flight inspection and stuck it in the stacks and wiggled it around to check for loose or missing exhaust nuts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Posts: 153
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee USA
This is all correct. The post war Hayes and Hughes conversions sported a collector ring for the upper seven cylinders for noise and ease of maintenance, while the lower seven had the individual Clayton "S" stacks.
The Super Cat sported either the Claytons on all cylinders, or all 14 cylinders tied to 2 collectors. Of the six 25's I've flown, only one was fully equipped with Claytons. Very loud indeed. But, quintessential in appearance. A workload if a stack stud was pulled on an upper cylinder though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
This is all true for the B-25's that are currently in existence, but I believe the early models, A's, B's, C's and D's had complete top and bottom collector rings with a single outboard exhaust. Only retro fitted ealry model B-25's had the short stacks in any combination.
Some of you B-25 guys out there could correct me if I'm wrong.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The CWH B-25 is the only one that I've seen that had a collector top and bottom.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:57 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
but I believe the early models, A's, B's, C's and D's had complete top and bottom collector rings with a single outboard exhaust.

Ds had the short stacks.
Image
Capt Austin Eivers 42nd BG 1943
Quote:
The CWH B-25 is the only one that I've seen that had a collector top and bottom.

That's a strange one-of-a-kind set up. Looks like 2 half rings with a dual instead of a single exhaust dump.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Last edited by Jack Cook on Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:14 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
Kermit Weeks "Apache Princess" and the Mid Atlantic air museums "briefing Time" have the short stacks all the way around.

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:05 pm
Posts: 258
Location: Plano, TX
As does Cavanaughs "How Boot That!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:45 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
As does Cavanaughs "How Boot That!"

and Axis nightmare.
Here's another question................
How many B-25s still have the low profile carb intakes??

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
Jack Cook wrote:
How many B-25s still have the low profile carb intakes??


The New England Air Musem's B-25H, "Dog Daize", still retains the low profile intakes.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
I kind of figured it was config of the exhaust but wasnt sure.. now i know. 8)

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: B-25 PROPS
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:01 pm
Posts: 262
__

Jack Cook wrote:
.....Ds had the short stacks.....



....is that photo reversed or did some B-25 props turn the wrong way?...

__


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: B-25 props
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:01 pm
Posts: 262
__

........that looks better...

__


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Posts: 153
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee USA
Pacific Prowler has the "low profile" carburetor air intakes fabricated to fit the post war installation Bendix Stromberg PR48A4 carburetor. During wartime the R-2600 had Holley carbs. By the way the low profile Holley carb intakes are termed "Carter" intakes.
Yes, the early A & B models only had the collector ring. It was determined that the exhaust flame was overly visible a night. Hence, the Clayton S stacks.
I had a B-24 pilot CBI veteran explain that at night, the Japanese fighters would target the center of the exhaust, since they couldnt see the airplanes. They would fly a loose formation with the bomber, behind and below and attempt to lob rounds into the bombers. This particular pilot, Bob Chambers, once entered a shallow descent toward the outline of mountainous terrain, narrowly clearing the ridge line. The Japanese pilot, focused on maintaining firing position behind the 24's exhaust plume, flew into the terrain. True story, as this pilot provided me with a written narrative of all his missions.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group