Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 9:54 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 12v gauges
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:44 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
I have been told that either a TBM or TBD(?) had 12v gauges. Is this true? If not, were there any WWII aircraft that DID have 12v gauges? I thought they were all 24v.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 12 volt
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:53 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Almost all Spitfires were built as 12 volt. Some rebuilds have been Americanized to 24 on the theory that more must be better and we must be smarter now than RJM was back then. Mine is as original starts just fine off of a small gel cell battery like a motoriwed wheechair, if the ignition and prime are right. It is easy to overprime when hot. I don't know if the voltage is stepped down to the gauges. I think many guages may be vacumn or direct read and not all electric.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 3:55 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
If I remember correctly, the AT-6A had a 12 volt system. The rest were 24 though. I think some of the other PT type trainers were also 12 volts. I don't know of any big iron that is though.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Toronto, Canada
I'm not sure how it corresponds to the T-6 line, but the Harvard Mk II and Mk IIBs were all 12 volt systems. When they got to the MkIVs they went to 24v.

Edward


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Posts: 153
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee USA
The TBM I fly (Fighter Factory) has a 28VDC, 200amp generator. 24v 36amp hr battery. Thats the WWII configuration.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 4:32 pm 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
The T-6Gs were upgraded to 24v IIRC.

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Anyone have a US source for Spitfire gauges?

I need the following...

Oil Pressure
Fuel Level
Temp.
Voltmeter

A start button would be helpful too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:10 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
retroaviation wrote:
If I remember correctly, the AT-6A had a 12 volt system. The rest were 24 though. I think some of the other PT type trainers were also 12 volts. I don't know of any big iron that is though.

Gary
Thru SNJ-4 and thru AT-6C were 12 volts I believe. Harvard 4 is 24 volts. L-5E and G were 24 volts I think while the L-5 and L-5B were 12 volts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
Interestingly enough, my 1939 NA-64 Yale, the Grandaddy of all your (and mine) T6s has a 24volt system. I thought that all T6s also had 24v systems. As most of you know the 220 Yales produced were built in Englewood and T6s were coming off the same production line about 6 months later. Why would North American have produced 220 airplanes with a 24v system and then gone backwards to 12v for the next several thousand aircraft?

Add this to the long, long list of things I don't know about warbirds. :oops:

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Posts: 1663
Location: Baltimore MD
Most airframes started out as 12V prior to WWII. When wiring requirements went up due to the number of systems, 24V was a solution because it reduces the requirements for wire diameter by 1/2, saving a LOT of weight in big airframes. Also, 24V was preferred because it was easier to drive dynamotors for old school radios. After WWII NATO standardized 24V for all aircraft systems for the preceding reasons and because you could use any vehicle as an external power supply.

Not all L-5E's were 24V, only some later ones modified for the USN or USMC. Mine is one of the last ones built and deployed and was never 24V. All the L-5G's were 24V, and some of them were made from E airframes.

_________________
REMEMBER THE SERGEANT PILOTS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
Forgotten Field wrote:
Quote:
Most airframes started out as 12V prior to WWII. When wiring requirements went up due to the number of systems, 24V was a solution because it reduces the requirements for wire diameter by 1/2, saving a LOT of weight in big airframes. Also, 24V was preferred because it was easier to drive dynamotors for old school radios. After WWII NATO standardized 24V for all aircraft systems for the preceding reasons and because you could use any vehicle as an external power supply.


But why would they make 220 airplanes with 24v and then go backward to 12v on T6s?

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Posts: 153
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee USA
Hmmm... the T-6's/SNJ/Harvards I have flown had 24V systems. 28VDC generators (50 amp - on line at 1250 RPM, offline below 1000, full rated above 1650 RPM). 24V battery.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:26 pm
Posts: 630
EDowning wrote:
Forgotten Field wrote:
Quote:
Most airframes started out as 12V prior to WWII. When wiring requirements went up due to the number of systems, 24V was a solution because it reduces the requirements for wire diameter by 1/2, saving a LOT of weight in big airframes. Also, 24V was preferred because it was easier to drive dynamotors for old school radios. After WWII NATO standardized 24V for all aircraft systems for the preceding reasons and because you could use any vehicle as an external power supply.


But why would they make 220 airplanes with 24v and then go backward to 12v on T6s?


Eric-

I wonder if Crevasse converted your Yale to 24 volt when he restored it? I am with you, I have a hard time imagining that they built the Yale 24 volt and then reverted to 12 volt for the AT-6C/SNJ-4 line and prior. Many of the earlier airplanes were later converted to 24 volt. We do not see very many 12 volt airplanes come through our shop. In fact of the 20 or so T-6s we annualed last year, I can only think of one that was 12 volt. All the T-6s that I have flown are also 24 volt.

We discovered yesterday while hanging the three QECs on the three airplanes that we are rebuilding that there are some minor changes required to get everything to fit between the 12 volt and 24 volt systems. We had some 12 volt bracketry slip into our workflow and we had to change them so that each component would fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:24 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Anyone have any contact info for Wayne Jordan, Binghamton, NY. I hear he has alot of instruments. Can't find a phone number though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Toronto, Canada
Of the 5 Harvards I've flown all the Mk IIs were 12v, and all the Mk IVs were 24.

On the topic of the Yale, most of them in RCAF service were eventually relegated to use as Wireless trainers as more Harvards came online. So Eric, is it possible the Yales were 12 V when they came off the line and then with the higher demands places on the electrical system as wireless trainers they were upgraded to 24 volts? There was supposedly a fair bit of conversion done in Canada to the Yales that were bound for France but ended up diverted here. It wouldn't surprise me if this was one of them.

CHAA has just about finished a Yale restoration and it should fly in the spring. I'll have to inquire as to what kind of electrical system it has.

BTW - Eric, did your Yale come out of the Ernie Simmons' collection or did it survive elsewhere?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group