Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 2:03 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:58 am
Posts: 214
Location: northeastern US
PJ wrote:
What amazes me is that people wear the dumbest things to fly on civilian aircraft (non warbird). Shorts, flip-flops, tank tops, etc..


Goes back to the "just like driving in my car" philosophy.

I suspect helmets will slowly come into vogue much as headsets did. When I was getting my license, the aircraft I trained in that had radios all had the hand-held mics and crappy little speakers in the ceiling. I don't remember anyone wearing headsets. Now you're hard-pressed to find someone not wearing one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Eric Friedebach wrote:
I had one in my hands the other day. It seemed like I could rap it against the corner of the bench and put a hole in it.


The shell is made of Kevlar, so I don't think you're going to damage it that much, EVEN with an impact from something of more significance than the corner of a bench.

The only shell I have personally seen damaged is one that I damaged myself...I was the victim of a student who unloaded the jet too much while we were dogfighting. As a result of the negative G, my helmet smashed the canopy -- cracking the canopy AND putting an inch-long fracture in the shell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:44 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Ollie wrote:
The thing I dislike with my 55 is that I can only wear one visor at the time, Flight Suit didn't want to sell me the dual visor kit, because they said I would scratch me visors.


Works fine for me.

Image

It's a good thing that Flightsuits knows how to take care of your equipment better than you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:09 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
That's what I thought too Randy. :?

Too bad for them, my next helmet will not be bought there. 8)

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 6:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
Ollie wrote:
That's what I thought too Randy. :?

Too bad for them, my next helmet will not be bought there. 8)

Just buy a visor on ebay ;)

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:13 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
No, I want a new helmet for helo flying. I'm doing fine flying the Focke-Wulf with just one visor on my helmet!

:wink:

But I'll still have a look!

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 9
Location: Indiana
A few years ago, flightsuits posted a disclaimer in their catolog that the HGU series helmets provided no crash protection. And if that was what you were looking for, they recommended one of their helo helmets. Those were designed to provide such protection. BUT, you can not go wrong with using what ever is available to you. A friend of mine once recommended to me (no and it isn't Hacker) to put up my collar and zip up my flightsuit. He saw a number of guys in Vietnam who had crashed and were severley burnt on the back of their necks and on their chests. So, roll the sleves down over the gloves, zip it up, put your collar up, visor down, chin strap on, strap on your parachute, and finally buckle up your Hooker 5 pt and have a blast!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 5:17 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Panama City, Florida
"The HGU-55/P helmet system provides basic head protection, sound attenuation, and communication system for aircrew personnel." Basically it's a suspension assembly for the mask, comm system and NVG's. This is right out of the Tech Order for the helmet.

The HGU-55/P helmet will provide a lot of protection during the initial impact, but break after that. It's a protective helmet not a crash helmet.
You can take it and slam it against a desk corner and crack the shell. I take condemned helmet shells and demonstrate this during Life Support Equipment training. I work on MC-130's (Spec-Ops) now, and the crewdogs can get up and walk around putting them in danger of slamming the helmet and breaking it. Unlike in the fast-movers where you are in the seat for the entire ride.

Randy is right in the fact that it was designed for the fast-movers, but it made its way into the heavy world. I've been working on the HGU-55/P since I graduated from tech school in 1986. Great helmet seen it save a lot of pilots and crewdogs. The HGU-55/P was designed to replace the HGU-26/P helmet, which was causing neck strains on the pilots and was a heavy helmet. The new light weight helmet made it easier for them to look around, was cut back further to allow better peripheral vision, and put less stress on the neck.

21 years in Aircrew Life Support "Your Life is Our Business"

Mike Bernhardt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:11 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
I just remembered, there's also the British Alpha helmet out there, I've seen a few and they are very good. If Transport Canada uses them, it must be good. I think... :roll: :lol:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:03 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Toronto, ON
I agree with you Tim. I hate to see guys wearing shorts and T-shirts and a headset flying these old birds. We all have friends who wish they had hard hats and nomex after the fact. I wore one of the Campbell helmets a couple of weeks ago. Nice vintage look over a hard shell and does a good job of keeping things quiet without ANR. Of course, I still want ANR in the TBM!

Glenn

_________________
"Remember....it's always better to overshoot and have people think you can't land than to crash and prove it!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:58 am
Posts: 214
Location: northeastern US
ffuries wrote:
"...the HGU-26/P helmet, which was causing neck strains on the pilots and was a heavy helmet.


Probably explains how my neck size went from 14.5" before I started flying TAC and ended up at 16" when I finished :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 5:17 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Panama City, Florida
True, most of the old TAC guys when I first came in did have thick necks. Guess they got a good workout with the old 26/P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:42 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
Ollie wrote:
I just remembered, there's also the British Alpha helmet out there, I've seen a few and they are very good. If Transport Canada uses them, it must be good. I think... :roll: :lol:

Well, If it's helo you're gonna fly, those are about the only options. The Gentex HGU-56 helmet or an Alpha 200/900. Never fly a helo with a 55! There is also the CFG Gallet LH series of helmets, but I don't know much about them.

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:10 am 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
I know that. I was making a suggestion for those looking for a stronger crash helmet. In the same vein, I propose motorcycle helmets.

Those things are expensive, I can't buy 2 of them every year or there won't be any money left for fuel in the Fw.

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:16 am 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
One time I gave away a bunch of my old flightsuits to someone who wanted to loan them to their PAX when they gave rides. Somewhere I’ve heard that Nomex loses its fire protection qualities after X number of washings, though.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group