Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 2:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:39 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
I love you man - PM (or email, think you're in my addy book, though for some reason my Yahoo account seems to drop folks off for no reason on occasion).

Coming at you one way or another. :lol:

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:34 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Chicoartist wrote:
I see she went to Osan.


Image

Image

striker01 wrote:
From what I found out 68-0339 went to RoKAF (South Korea) in 1989


So I assume she was trasnferred to the ROKAF while at Osan AB?

Anybody have any contacts in the South Korean Air Force?

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:44 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
I've got great news :D :D :D

Here is what I got from the ROKAF database on:

http://www.scramble.nl/index.html

Serial: 80-339, Type:F-4E, CN: 3385, Unit: 17 FW/152 FS

Status: Active 16oct05


The 17th Fighter Wing / 152nd Tactical Fighter Squadron is based out of Chongju AB.

So it still looks like she's still flying.


Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:56 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
That's simply AWESOME!

Thanks, guys! 8)

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:41 am
Posts: 117
Location: Farmingdale, ME
Thank's for all that info Wade ... I will look into it as it may be nice to have the Vietnam era edition of his series ..

RJ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
The one you are looking for is:

United States Credits for the Destruction of Enemy Aircraft in Air-to-Air Combat Post World War Two: Victory List No.10, by Frank J. Olynyk, self-published, Aurora, Ohio, January 1999. This volume covers Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War I, and I'm sure there's a skirmish or two thrown in there somewhere (if we got any victories during said skirmish, that is). I just checked several rare book sites, and I can't find any of his Victory List books. No. 10 listed above was the last one he put out.

He told me he's going to do an RAF/Europe/WWII volume, which will be a huge set. I really do hope he gets to it.

The difference between Frank's "Victory List" books (10 books) and his Stars and Bars (click book title) is that Stars and Bars covers 'only' the American aces 1920*-1973 (and it's well worth every penny, BTW), while his "Victory List" books covers each and every victory claim by any and all pilots for the time period covered by the book. It should be noted that ground claims are not covered in any of Frank's books, only aerial Destroyed/Damaged/Probable claims.

Sure, we'll uncover the odd mistake in his work, but you will not find the topic of aerial victories covered better or more comprehensively anywhere else. As I said, the AFAA considers Frank's work on ace's claims to be "the last word on the subject".

They pop up on eBay every now and then - good stuff.

*Stars and Bars starts with 1920, but one of Frank's Victory List books covers WW1.

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Chicoartist wrote:
Connery wrote:
He also said they also put a gun pod on the centerline hard point at times as well.


In the Chico role, 339 never flew with three gun pods. Why would they do that when the internal cannon (20 mm) was already there? In her Chico role, 339 always mounted a 600-gallon tank on the center station. But yes, before the internal cannoned E-model, the 366th indeed mounted centerline 20mm pods, thus their nickname, The Gunfighters.

I've heard from folks over the years who knew of a FOUR pod-equipped C or D-model Phantom that operated only a few times with the Gunfighters. The jet was such a pig that they abandoned the practice.

Fun stuff!

Wade


Not sure if this is 339 or not but it does show 3 gun pods in use.

http://www.5053phantoms.com/Movies/Gun_Shot.avi

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:41 am
Posts: 117
Location: Farmingdale, ME
Can't get the vid to play but I am pretty sure I know whcih one it is ... And the jet in the vid is a C or D I believe ...

RJ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
I am not on a computer right now where I can see the video, but it isn't 339 in it's "Chico" role - that, you can take to the bank. 8)

Besides, add two pods to any E-model, and your grand total of available 20mm Gatling cannons is, what? Save the centerline station for fuel - you're gonna need it!

All the guys I talked to during and after my painting was completed mentioned "airshow-type" loads like 3-4 gun pods, and yes, some flew that way, but it was rare, and not long-lasting. Two was the limit and still have the jet operationally viable. Even "Chico" died out after the Wing moved to Takhli - the distances were too great to the DMZ area to drag all that high-drag firepower around and make it worth the trouble. These aren't my opinions, but those of the guys who flew these things in Vietnam.

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Thanks Wade

I assumed it wasn't 339 (i.e. no fuselage gunfire and the shorter afterburner cans of an earlier model F-4) but still it was pretty cool to see 3 gun pods being fired at once.

Here's is another one on Uwe's website for all you "Pheff Phour Phreaks" out there.

http://www.5053phantoms.com/Movies/F4Phantom.wmv

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:24 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
Here is a link to the 421st FS as they are presently constituted:

http://www.388fw.acc.af.mil/library/fac ... sp?id=4222

Thanks,

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:01 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
That would be so smooth if they brought back "Chico" in the form of an F-16.

Drop the tanks and imagine a couple of SUU-23/A gunpods in their place :twisted:

Ground Forces: CHICO this is PUNISHER 34......CHICO-PUNISHER 34.. solid copy on "Danger Close",.. proceed to target...over"

CHICO: "Roger Punisher...inbound your position in one mike.....and you might want to duck...over"

Image

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Anyone know if the USAF still has any gunpods still in the inventory?

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Last edited by Shay on Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:43 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I believe so. They might mainly be used for gunnery practice.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Noha307 and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group