Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 12:15 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Prop nomenclature
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
This is the second time ive seen this in old WWII photos... The prop nomenclature normally is seen stenciled going in the same direction of the prop. For example: the Ham Standard stickers on the props and then closer to the prop hub is the nomenclature. Well in some photos I see that the nomenclature is in the same spot but goes across the width of the prop.

Looks at the first pic from this thread posted by Wade.
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... 62&start=0

I also found prop nomenclature turned differently when researching the paint scheme for the Blue Angel's F8F for LSFM. There was a pic of Butch Voris's #1 plane with the wording going across the width of the prop.

Does anyone know if there was a particular reason why the nomenclature is changed?

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:31 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
someone was bored and wanted a change. Should not make a difference as long as the info is correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:37 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
I figured its not really going to make a difference, I just didnt know the reason.

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:23 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
maybe they did it so the pilots would not fall over when they tried to turn their head sideways to read it.

Something I had wondered about, How come there were so many items with the same designation, ie, M1 Garand, M1 Carbine, M1 helmet, M2 carbine, M2 .50 cal machine gun,
seems confusing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Speculation only but, could it be a quick visual clue for the crew chief or maintenance officer that denoted that prop as having been to an overhaul shop or part of a service mod program? That #2 prop looks to be fresher than the rest of the airframe......

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:40 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
The Inspector wrote:
Speculation only but, could it be a quick visual clue for the crew chief or maintenance officer that denoted that prop as having been to an overhaul shop or part of a service mod program? That #2 prop looks to be fresher than the rest of the airframe......


Thats kind of what I was thinking.... :)

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:38 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
My guess is that these were overhauled at a depot and each depot may have had a little different way of marking things. Of course the technician might have been a little hung over too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
bdk wrote:
...Of course the technician might have been a little hung over too.


That's kind of what I was thinking... :)

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Larry Kraus and 294 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group