Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 2:25 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Bet that got your attention! :wink:

http://www.aviatorsale.com/aircraft/View_image.asp?AircraftID=2294&PicID=1

Also look here:
http://www.aviatorsale.com/Warbird_And_Classic/
Canberra
C-45H
Broussard
Convair 990 (!)
Tiger Moth
8 each TBM Avenger
Me-108 (Nord?)
F-100F
3 each P-51D
Mig-21
Yak-3M
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: I always wondered
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 2:58 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
I always wondered, why build a 3/4 scale aircraft, why not go all out and do full scale replica? Is it really that much cheaper to build 1/4 less?

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I always wondered
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Scott WRG Editor wrote:
I always wondered, why build a 3/4 scale aircraft, why not go all out and do full scale replica? Is it really that much cheaper to build 1/4 less?


Probably not from a materials stand point but I'll bet the powerplants for a 3/4 scale are much more plentiful and substantially less. A 3/4 scale 109 could probably be made to fly well on just a couple of hundred horsepower. At full scale I bet that number goes up 3 or 4 times at least and 6 or 7 times if you want to match the power of the full size. There are not too many available powerplants that can produce upwards of 750 hp and still fit in the nose of a 109, and I'd bet none of what is applicable is "cheap".

PS- The last Mustang on the list is said to be in single seat configuration with dual controls added. What the heck does that mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I always wondered
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 4:02 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Chad Veich wrote:

Probably not from a materials stand point but I'll bet the powerplants for a 3/4 scale are much more plentiful and substantially less. A 3/4 scale 109 could probably be made to fly well on just a couple of hundred horsepower. At full scale I bet that number goes up 3 or 4 times at least and 6 or 7 times if you want to match the power of the full size. There are not too many available powerplants that can produce upwards of 750 hp and still fit in the nose of a 109, and I'd bet none of what is applicable is "cheap".


Thats a good point, thanks.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I always wondered
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 4:53 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Chad Veich wrote:
PS- The last Mustang on the list is said to be in single seat configuration with dual controls added. What the heck does that mean?

I think that means that it has some controls in back, but is not the full dual control setup with instruments in back and the extended (ugly) canopy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:05 pm
Posts: 946
Location: Brisbane Australia
High all

I think there actually is one for sale here - in Sydney I think- a real one. It was one of a couple of projects brought in from Russia via Canada or somewhere and is apparently up fpr sale again - Graham Orphan would know the details as it was mentioned in Classic wings in the article on 109 survivors lately.

Regards
John Parker


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:53 pm
Posts: 299
Location: UK
Might be nice if the site was updated occasionally, P51D G-SIRR was sold over a year ago and exported back to America.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 5:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 1048
Location: Whittier CA USA, 25 miles east of Los Angeles
Yuck...that's suppossed to be a 109?

JH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 109G
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:38 pm
Posts: 490
Location: Oklahoma
More like 109-ish instead of 109G. That canopy no doubt works a lot better than a scale canopy with all of the heavy bracing but it sure doesn't do anything for the overall looks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Finland
I have also seen in USA some really cool scaled down 109:s. Have you ?

rgds,

Juke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 1:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2923
Like these????
Image
Read all about them here...
http://www.web-birds.com/miller/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 2:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Finland
Right ! :shock:

Does that have a V-6 or V-8 engine on it ? Erla haube canopy would look cooler !
I think there is another venture too....sorry. I saw it years ago in WARBIRDS mag.


rgds,

Juke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:18 am
Posts: 57
Location: Australia
Hi all,
I think 3/4 scale aircraft are built primarily for MTOW restrictions regarding registration.But I concur that the overall costs do probably play an important part.

_________________
Regards,
R.J.Mitchell


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:18 am
Posts: 57
Location: Australia
Those miller 109's sure look good. It's a shame they're not interested in producing any more flying examples.

_________________
Regards,
R.J.Mitchell


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:45 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
Forget the 109 - I WANT THE F-100!! LOL - for the love of $385K!! I spoke with Randy Ball about this plane - he flys a Mig-17 for Jetfighters Inc?? Anyway, he said the F-100 is a beauty to fly but a holy B***H to maintain - difficult and expensive brakes, electronic components add up to a $1000 per hour flying cost.

Anyway - does anyone want to help me out with a 0% interest rate?? :wink:

Tom P
www.wendoverairbase.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group