Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 1521
Location: Zurich & Zug / Switzerland
Robbie Stuart wrote:
If I remember correctly, the first two YP-82's had Merlins, then the first 20 or so P-82B's had Allisions. :D
Robbie


nope

XP-82 44-83886/44-83887 - 1860 hp Packard Merlin V-1650-23/25
XP-82A 44-83888 - 1500 hp Allison V-1710-119
P-82B/C/D 44-65160/44-65179 - Packard Merlin V-1560-19/21
P-82E/F/G/H 46-255/46-504 - 1600 hp Allison V-1710-143/145

Martin

_________________
Flying is easy: just learn how to throw yourself at the ground and miss


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:30 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
So is this bad for the CAF? :cry: Seems like no one else is concerned.

IMHO, the USAFM does not need another P/F-82. Or in any case take away from others.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:25 pm
Posts: 441
Location: Propwash 16Xray
I thought the CAF was gonna sell it, and thats what brought this on.
:?: :?: :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:37 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Who is battling the CAF over ownership?
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:05 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
You can't sell something you don't own. This happened with another aircraft besides the P-82. I don't know who owns the P-82 though.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 349
Location: South Central Minnesota
51fixer wrote:
Who is battling the CAF over ownership?
Rich


USAF. As the story has been told, apparently the P-82 was on loan to the CAF until such day that they no longer wanted it. At that time it was to be returned to the USAF. Sounds clear enough but from what I've been told nobody on either side of the "Debate" can generate any dated paperwork to substantiate their claim...hence the court case.

Any idea what started coming apart inside Bald Eagles engine? Who was that one built by? PM me if you don't want to post.

Thanks,
John


Last edited by John Beyl on Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
John, the USAF's position is that it was on loan. The CAF's position is that they were given the deed on the aircraft and that the paperwork was lost over the years or something to the sort. Plus the CAF claims that they did a title check on the aircraft and nothing was returned, in effect proving that the USAF doesn't claim ownership on the aircraft. The court case will have that title search entered as evidence and the USAF will enter its claims for ownership into evidence, and then the judge and/or jury will then decide who's got the better claim for the aircraft and they'll be awarded the title.

I'm sure it'll be a bit more bitter of a fight than I make it sound, but the basics are the same. Both organizations claim ownership of the aircraft and both believe they have proof showing that they're right. Now it's up to the court to decide who's going to get it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I really have no idea who owns the thing, I just hope whoever is right wins.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 349
Location: South Central Minnesota
CAPFlyer wrote:
John, the USAF's position is that it was on loan. The CAF's position is that they were given the deed on the aircraft and that the paperwork was lost over the years or something to the sort. Plus the CAF claims that they did a title check on the aircraft and nothing was returned, in effect proving that the USAF doesn't claim ownership on the aircraft. The court case will have that title search entered as evidence and the USAF will enter its claims for ownership into evidence, and then the judge and/or jury will then decide who's got the better claim for the aircraft and they'll be awarded the title.

I'm sure it'll be a bit more bitter of a fight than I make it sound, but the basics are the same. Both organizations claim ownership of the aircraft and both believe they have proof showing that they're right. Now it's up to the court to decide who's going to get it.


Yes, thanks for a refresher of the facts. I was close but not completely on the nail. I've heard (But have no facts) that the same arrangement exists for the B-29 and SB2C. If the court finds in favor of the USAF, I can't help but wonder what that will mean for them.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
Hmm. It's interesting that it's not listed anywhere on the CAF's site among all their owned a/c. Unless I overlooked it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 219
CAPFlyer has most of the facts....however, we DO have a title; it isn't lost. The B-29 is operated under a slightly different arrangement and is not in any danger of being "repossessed" by the AF. The SB2C is in no way in jeopardy; ditto for all the other airplanes in the fleet. The venue change is not a good thing for the CAF, but not a terrible thing either. Both sides will have their day in court. We are hopeful of a favorable ruling.

Old Shep


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
FAA Registry
N-Number Inquiry Results

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N12102 is Assigned

Aircraft Description

Serial Number 44-65162
Type Registration Corporation
Manufacturer Name NORTH AMERICAN
Certificate Issue Date 04/20/2005
Model F82B
Status Valid
Type Aircraft Fixed Wing Multi-Engine
Type Engine Reciprocating
Pending Number Change None
Dealer No
Date Change Authorized None
Mode S Code 50054734
MFR Year 1944 Fractional Owner NO

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Registered Owner

Name COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE
Street PO BOX 62000
City MIDLAND State TEXAS Zip Code 79711-2000
County MIDLAND
Country UNITED STATES


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Old Shep wrote:
CAPFlyer has most of the facts....however, we DO have a title; it isn't lost. The B-29 is operated under a slightly different arrangement and is not in any danger of being "repossessed" by the AF. The SB2C is in no way in jeopardy; ditto for all the other airplanes in the fleet. The venue change is not a good thing for the CAF, but not a terrible thing either. Both sides will have their day in court. We are hopeful of a favorable ruling.

Old Shep


Didn't the SB2C come from the Air Museum in the 70s?
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:40 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
mustanglover wrote:


Registered Owner

Name COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE
Street PO BOX 62000
City MIDLAND State TEXAS Zip Code 79711-2000
County MIDLAND
Country UNITED STATES


Registered owner and true legal owner are not always the same in the FAA registration world!
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:47 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Just like the C-123 at Air Heritage.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 253 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group