Fri May 01, 2009 6:12 pm
retroaviation wrote:262crew wrote:Great photo's! I think the BT is a better looking airplane then the T-6!
Blasphemy! That's like saying an N3N is better lookin' than a Stearman.![]()
![]()
Ducks and hides, waiting for N3N Jeff to blast me.....
![]()
![]()
Gary
Fri May 01, 2009 6:28 pm
Forgotten Field wrote:Still wouldn't catch me doing it.
Why? That's an interesting quote from somebody who has bt-13.org...
The SB's on the airplane were from the wooden tail models which had failures during excessive acrobatic flight. There are certain airplanes which I would hesitate doing acrobatic flight in, but most of them would do fine in that situation. What is your justification for such a statement?
Fri May 01, 2009 6:51 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 7:34 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 10:10 pm
Fri May 01, 2009 11:29 pm
retroaviation wrote:262crew wrote:Great photo's! I think the BT is a better looking airplane then the T-6!
Blasphemy! That's like saying an N3N is better lookin' than a Stearman.![]()
![]()
Ducks and hides, waiting for N3N Jeff to blast me.....
![]()
![]()
Gary
Fri May 01, 2009 11:30 pm
Sat May 02, 2009 8:19 am
262crew wrote:retroaviation wrote:262crew wrote:Great photo's! I think the BT is a better looking airplane then the T-6!
Blasphemy! That's like saying an N3N is better lookin' than a Stearman.![]()
![]()
Ducks and hides, waiting for N3N Jeff to blast me.....
![]()
![]()
Gary
How dare you sir!? We shall draw pistols at dawn for this insult!N3N to a Stearman thats a tough one! Both are graceful.............I give up I don't want any part of that argument!
Sat May 02, 2009 9:17 pm
Sun May 03, 2009 12:26 am
Has anyone ever reskinned one of these and used modern fuel tank sealant?skymstr02 wrote:The problem with BT's performing acro is the resultant fuel tank leaks.
Sun May 03, 2009 12:50 am
N3Njeff wrote:
Personally I DO think a BT is better than a T6........................A stearman is not bad looking either for a cheap N3N knockoff.................![]()
Gary, you should get out of that hot texas sun................Come up north, we can fix that
Sun May 03, 2009 2:11 am
Roger Cain wrote:N3Njeff wrote:
Personally I DO think a BT is better than a T6........................A stearman is not bad looking either for a cheap N3N knockoff.................![]()
Gary, you should get out of that hot texas sun................Come up north, we can fix that
Wow, and all this time I thought the Stearman came before the N3N, silly me.
Sun May 03, 2009 10:10 am
Sun May 03, 2009 11:04 am
bdk wrote:Has anyone ever reskinned one of these and used modern fuel tank sealant?skymstr02 wrote:The problem with BT's performing acro is the resultant fuel tank leaks.
Sun May 03, 2009 11:29 am
Mark D wrote: I have - with PRC