Spitfire Pieces at Morotai

[HarvardIV]

Delete

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:39 am, edited 7 times in total.

[CorsairFreak]

No pics.

[HarvardIV]

N/A

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

[CorsairFreak]

Now when I click on the link it says "Forbidden: You don't have permission to acces"

[Dan Johnson II]

From the two photos I could see those were definately not Spitfire Props.

Dan

[HarvardIV]

N/A

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

[srpatterson]

Looks like a Ham Standard to me...

[HarvardIV]

Delete

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

[HarvardIV]

Delete

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

[Ollie]

Well, the Rotol prop was wooden and the one in your picture is metal, so they're not the same.

[HarvardIV]

N/A

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

[srpatterson]

While the hubs are similiar the Rotol prop has a completly different blade. Look at the differences at the shank, and also the radius of the blade from mid cord to the tip.

Definately not a Spitfire prop.

[HarvardIV]

N/A

Last edited by HarvardIV on Sat May 07, 2005 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

[Ollie]

Corsair maybe!

B-29?

Anything with 4 blades.

Chris, Canada never built a Spit, we built Hurricanes fitted with H-S propellers.

[Mike]

Hi Ollie:

The Aussie props were Rotols too? I believe the Canadian ones used an American prop anyway..

Canadian-built Hurricanes used a Ham Std prop (3-blader). There were no Canadian-built Spitfires.

That is definately not a Spitfire prop.