Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:55 pm
Does anyone else find it disturbing that Enterprise is going to NYC, when the city has no connection to the Shuttle program at all - and the US Air Airbus that landed in the Hudson, an aircraft that has a very strong, tangible link to the city, has ended up in a South Carolina aviation museum?
Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:07 am
StangStung wrote:Does anyone else find it disturbing that Enterprise is going to NYC, when the city has no connection to the Shuttle program at all - and the US Air Airbus that landed in the Hudson, an aircraft that has a very strong, tangible link to the city, has ended up in a South Carolina aviation museum?
Check out the last 8 pages. I'm sure it's in there somewhere.
Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:31 am
67Cougar wrote:Does anyone else find it disturbing that Enterprise is going to NYC, when the city has no connection to the Shuttle program at all - and the US Air Airbus that landed in the Hudson, an aircraft that has a very strong, tangible link to the city, has ended up in a South Carolina aviation museum?
I know the answer to why (tourist dollars), but good grief ... that just ain't right.
Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:36 am
Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:39 am
RandolphB wrote:Really...? Does nobody remember that the Airbus was on its way TO the Carolinas when it encountered the birds on takeoff in NYC? That's the reason the museum there even wanted it at all...
Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:42 am
airnutz wrote:
Yup, but in a nutshell for 67cougar and CaptainTexas, tourist destination intensity numbers were the "metric" in location selection.