Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
T-28mike wrote:
"Everybody in the aircraft world should have an issue with it since it produces hydrogen embrittlement in many metals, including aluminum, plated by it. It also makes the cracks in the base material very difficult to detect. Just not a good idea."


There are many parts of aircraft chrome plated on a regular basis by manufacturers. The modern aircraft contains both decorative chrome such as a fuselage step, and "hard" or industrial chrome such as landing gear oleo struts. They have been doing so for years.

I was also going to post the applicible specs relating to chrome plating and post plating baking procedures, but decided I'm not going to waste any more of my time doing that here.


Edit to add: Using that same reasoning, we should not use or have any Cad plated hardware on our aircraft either, yet we do, it is required in the material spec for the hardware.


Understood and I realize that. Please don’t have a come-apart on me. I guess I should have taken the time to craft a better answer. The decorative parts are not of much concern. As far as the industrial chromed parts are concerned, chrome plating is a necessary evil and done primarily on chromally steel parts which I believe are less susceptible to embrittlement and only in places where it is deemed absolutely necessary but I’m not a “former spurt” on the science. The trade off is a corrosion resistant and hard wearing long life surface. I’m not certain cad plating has the same embrittling effect on the base material as chrome does. Once again, I’m not a “former spurt” on the science.

John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 223
Location: State of confusion
John,

Nobody came apart on you. Sorry if you feel that way.
I simply disagreed with you, and backed my position for why I disagree, including reference that there is a material spec just for the procedure in question. In your first post, you insisted that everyone should have issue with chroming because of hydrogen embrittlement issues. I addressed that issue, and I gave two examples of approved chrome plating.
You then said you do not have issue with the decorative plating, yet that is what is done to a spinner, and was the question at issue leading to these last posts on this thread. Chroming spinners.


And for general info to everyone else reading this thread, yes, Cadmium plating causes hydrogen embrittlement in hardware. there are very specific guidelines regarding the baking process and time intervals between plating and baking for cad (and chrome) plating among others. Here is the important part: Never trust your plating of any aircraft part to a shop not capable of or farmiliar with the proper material spec for said operation. Someone's life may depend on it!

_________________
Expert:
Ex: Former.
Spurt: A drip under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
T-28mike wrote:
John,

Nobody came apart on you. Sorry if you feel that way.
I simply disagreed with you, and backed my position for why I disagree, including reference that there is a material spec just for the procedure in question. In your first post, you insisted that everyone should have issue with chroming because of hydrogen embrittlement issues. I addressed that issue, and I gave two examples of approved chrome plating.
You then said you do not have issue with the decorative plating, yet that is what is done to a spinner, and was the question at issue leading to these last posts on this thread. Chroming spinners.



We're cool and I'm OK with being educated as long as there is a reference trail behind the "Testimony!". As a rule learning something is the only reason I hit the internet. That said I like to see the paper trail so to speak since there is a lot of, well, BS flying out there. You suggested there were tech references to chroming but unfortunately did not supply a link to them. Not questioning you but I would like to see them.

No, I said I did not have an issue with chrome plating decorative parts, not decorative chrome plating on functional parts. The latter I do have issue with. I call a spinner a functional part. If it fails for any reason you have problems. If a doorstep or handrail fails...who cares? I think we’re on the same page…?

John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 223
Location: State of confusion
Wow,

Nice throw-back. You made some generalized B.S. comment like this:

Everybody in the aircraft world should have an issue with it since it produces hydrogen embrittlement in many metals, including aluminum, plated by it. It also makes the cracks in the base material very difficult to detect. Just not a good idea.

I countered with not only 2 examples of chrome parts that are certified by both the manufacturer, but obviously the Fed's, but I also stated that I really do not wish to waste the time to look up (and post) the actual material specs(on this site), but they are out there for those that do not know, and I stated that hydrogen embrittlement is easily prevented by following approved procedures.

I am no expert either, and I did not like the tone of what you inferred in your last post. If you really want me to recite to you the most current specs for both procedures that I stated were available, I would be happy to do so all you needed to do was ask.

From memory here are two. There are more:

Spec for cadmium plating of aircraft hardware: spec QQ-P-416

SAE/AMS spec for hard chrome (IIRC) is 2406L (or current letter)

These are all off the top of my head after a couple of brew's, and it is late. If you really wish to continue I will be happy to look up the most current revisions that I can find for you at my normal shop rate.

_________________
Expert:
Ex: Former.
Spurt: A drip under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
T-28mike wrote:
Wow,

Nice throw-back. You made some generalized B.S. comment like this:

Everybody in the aircraft world should have an issue with it since it produces hydrogen embrittlement in many metals, including aluminum, plated by it. It also makes the cracks in the base material very difficult to detect. Just not a good idea.

I countered with not only 2 examples of chrome parts that are certified by both the manufacturer, but obviously the Fed's, but I also stated that I really do not wish to waste the time to look up (and post) the actual material specs(on this site), but they are out there for those that do not know, and I stated that hydrogen embrittlement is easily prevented by following approved procedures.

I am no expert either, and I did not like the tone of what you inferred in your last post. If you really want me to recite to you the most current specs for both procedures that I stated were available, I would be happy to do so all you needed to do was ask.

From memory here are two. There are more:

Spec for cadmium plating of aircraft hardware: spec QQ-P-416

SAE/AMS spec for hard chrome (IIRC) is 2406L (or current letter)

These are all off the top of my head after a couple of brew's, and it is late. If you really wish to continue I will be happy to look up the most current revisions that I can find for you at my normal shop rate.


Thank you for supplying the spec’s Mike. That's what I was asking for so I can delve more into the topic and learn. I was absolutely not inferring anything negative towards you in the last post. Once again the written word is no match for a spoken conversation.

Regards,
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:56 pm
Posts: 138
More reading on the subject for those who wish to feed their inner nerd. I appologize for the broad brush I used in my earliest post on this subject. It was in error and based on old hangar talk heresay. Mike is correct that when done correctly, plating of many types can be successfully accomplished at minimal risk.

Regards,
John

http://www.omegaresearchinc.com/Publica ... .html#figa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:51 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2308
Polished aluminum looks 1000x better than the look favored by the chromosexuals.... :wink:

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group