T-28mike wrote:
John,
Nobody came apart on you. Sorry if you feel that way.
I simply disagreed with you, and backed my position for why I disagree, including reference that there is a material spec just for the procedure in question. In your first post, you insisted that everyone should have issue with chroming because of hydrogen embrittlement issues. I addressed that issue, and I gave two examples of approved chrome plating.
You then said you do not have issue with the decorative plating, yet that is what is done to a spinner, and was the question at issue leading to these last posts on this thread. Chroming spinners.
We're cool and I'm OK with being educated as long as there is a reference trail behind the "Testimony!". As a rule learning something is the only reason I hit the internet. That said I like to see the paper trail so to speak since there is a lot of, well, BS flying out there. You suggested there were tech references to chroming but unfortunately did not supply a link to them. Not questioning you but I would like to see them.
No, I said I did not have an issue with chrome plating decorative parts, not decorative chrome plating on functional parts. The latter I do have issue with. I call a spinner a functional part. If it fails for any reason you have problems. If a doorstep or handrail fails...who cares? I think we’re on the same page…?
John